reply to post by steppenwolf86
Chavez continues tocrack down and is highly critical of opposition broadcasters, but it still thrives.
24 families control 32% of radio broadcasters.
Conatel is mulling a review of radio licenses and is studying various types of penalties for 240 radio and 45 television
stations that could lead to closure because their data has not been updated.
The reforms … “will bear an enormous cost for the president, who will look like the great censor."
Radio and television outlets have in recent weeks stepped up their defense of their rights to exist and planned to reject the sanctions.
Chief among them was Globovision, which has been directly threatened with closure.
The government refused to renew the license of RCTV (Radio Caracas Television), the country's oldest and most popular television network, in May 2007
because of its critical news coverage. Although off the air, RCTV continues to be seen in Venezuela from Miami via cable and satellite systems.
The reforms seek to ensure that the media better reflect public opinion, said Rosario Pacheco, head of a congressional committee on the media.
Opponents of Chavez, who appears almost daily on official television, point out, however, that the government has created a state media network of
unprecedented size and scope.
"Six television, two radio networks, over 150 websites, a news agency and a publisher to promote socialism in the 21st century," Bisbal said.
In Venezuela, said El Mundo newspaper chief Omar Lugo, "one thing is missing: reliable and verifiable information."
www.breitbart.com...
Didn't a certain American president attempt to limit a certain broadcaster's access to White House press conferences? And hasn't a certain regulatory
agency persisted in its efforts to control American's access to and content of the internet?
It seems I recall reading that the top government law enforcement agency of a specific administration authorized the harassment/criminalization of
certain bloggers who happened to
receive content that was not otherwise unlawful and was, in fact, the subject of FOIA requests?
And who is it now, that exhorted his supporters to "punish our enemies?"
Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot.
jw
edit on 23-12-2011 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)