It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Announcement on mercury rules coming today

page: 1

log in


posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:34 PM
This is interesting. Especially since I did a search to see if there was a thread about this and found two. One is from 2005 and the other from 2006.

Here is the article regarding the announcement from today:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is expected to announce the finalization of the first-ever nationwide standards for mercury pollution from power plants today. The announcement will be made in a Washington, D.C., area hospital at 2 p.m. Florida currently ranks 15th in the nation for mercury pollution (.pdf) from power plants, and the Everglades currently has the highest levels in the state.

The regulation is the most expensive order being considered by the administration, and was formally signed by the EPA earlier this month. Many coal-reliant power producers have urged the EPA to give companies an additional year to comply with the new rules.

Here are the other two threads:
2005: Senate Votes on Mercury Rules
2006: A Rare MSM Look at the Revolving Door - Mercury Pollution in Illinois

Seems as though Mercury has been under scrutiny for quite some time, but it hasn't caught on. It appears that its dangers are addressed, then it gets buried again until someone raises the issue again. It also seems that money is the bottom line once again. No surprise there.

I haven't gone through the other threads yet. I just wanted to get them included with this thread, but I'm going to check them out in a bit and see if there are any overlapping names or issues. Should be interesting.

Feel free to add your own observations and news.

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:39 PM
doesn´t matter what the max limit is.

they´ll just reset it accordingly like they did with Fukushima.

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:41 PM
reply to post by kn0wh0w

Too true.
Just like Fukushima, they've obviously been burying the dangers of Mercury just the same.

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:41 PM
or Ann Coulter comes out and says mercury is actually good for you!

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:43 PM
reply to post by kn0wh0w

they set the safety limit pretty low just be safe.....exposure has alot to do with time spent at different levels....

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:45 PM
reply to post by kn0wh0w

Yeah, that video is classic. Soon, you'll start to hear:
Mercury! It's what's for dinner!
Radiation! The breakfast of champions!

The rate of idiocy is overwhelming.

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:50 PM
Sure, just what we need from those morons at the EPA. Regulate a powerplant that MIGHT be putting mercury into the environment, while in the mean time they mandate that light bulbs that do CONTAIN mercury be brought into your HOME.
edit on 21-12-2011 by JIMC5499 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:50 PM

Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by kn0wh0w

Yeah, that video is classic. Soon, you'll start to hear:
Mercury! It's what's for dinner!
Radiation! The breakfast of champions!

The rate of idiocy is overwhelming.

fluoride for that hollywood smile!
aspertame for a sugarfree diet! or should i say NutraSweet?
get your pack of smokes and hit of nicotine, it'll boost your stamina and endurance!

come get some goodies ladies and gentleman.

/end sarcasm

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:51 PM
And they want CFL's in the house (which has mercury). I was even given a "free" box from our utility company.

posted on Dec, 22 2011 @ 06:56 AM
I've read the other threads and discovered that both links to the articles referenced were broken.

Seeing as this will most likely happen to my article as well, I decided to copy a few main points, but first, I want to mention that the other two threads were centered upon coal-fired power plants while my article is in regards to nuclear power plants. They both still fuel the same Mercury risks associated with run off into the water needed for these plants.

The thread from 2005 touched upon the fact that pregnant women and young children were most at risk from Mercury exposure. My article mentions the study of the Ibis birds in South Florida who had homosexual tendencies until the mercury was cleaned from the water, then they started nesting with birds of the opposite sex.

Mercury in South Florida has caused major problems for the ecology and diversity of the Everglades. Coupled with sulfate (an agent used by agriculture in fertilizers and to control algal blooms), mercury becomes methylmercury — a substance that drastically alters the reproductive hormones of wading birds and even the endangered Florida panther.

As previously reported by The Florida Independent, one study conducted in the Everglades found that the ibis population was declining in large part due to altered mating habits — a direct result of mercury consumption. Mercury not only affected the ibis’ courtship habits, but also altered hormones, which led to a high percentage of male birds mating with other males. This particular study was the first that documented mercury’s effects on a bird’s sexual preference.

While I believe that a small number of people are born homosexual as a natural occurance, this evidence proving that Mercury caused homosexual tendencies in birds is very eye opening and may explain why we're seeing so many homosexuals in society today.

Here is the study about the Ibises. I copied the entire article since so many articles seem to be removed from the Internet after a period of time and I wanted everyone to be able to read it and understand how crucial this problem may be for humans.

When University of Florida researchers began studying the effects of mercury consumption on white ibises, they had a hunch the contaminant might affect the birds' ability to produce chicks.

And while their suspicions of poor breeding were confirmed, they didn’t expect this: altered courtship behavior in males and high percentages of male birds mating with other males.

“We knew that mercury can disrupt hormones – what is most disturbing about this study is the low levels of mercury at which we saw effects on hormones and mating behavior,” said Peter Frederick, a UF wildlife ecology and conservation professor who led the five-year study. “This suggests that wildlife may be commonly affected.”

The study marks the first time that mercury’s effects on birds’ sexual preference and courtship behavior have been documented, and provides a critical link between low levels of mercury contamination and impaired reproduction. The results suggest that even low levels of mercury – which is widespread in the U.S. and global environment — can result in major impairment for wild bird populations.

The study will be published online Dec. 1 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Everglades researchers began to notice high levels of mercury in many wildlife species, such as panthers, birds and fish, Frederick said. By the late 1990s, mercury levels in the Everglades had dropped dramatically, and suddenly the ibises were nesting like crazy.

Researchers believed that better hydrological conditions probably caused much of the birds’ renewed nesting enthusiasm, but something else also seemed to be at work, Frederick said – and that’s what prompted him and then-doctoral student Nilmini Jayasena to begin looking at mercury. The contaminant found its way into the Everglades via municipal and medical waste incineration, but during the 1990s, medical waste became more closely regulated and flashlight batteries that didn’t contain mercury replaced those that did.

The UF scientists built a 13,000-square-foot, net-covered aviary, and brought in 160 young ibises, which were divided into four groups made up of equal numbers of males and females.

I find this frightening on so many levels. If scientists hadn't made the connection between the Ibises' altered nesting practices and the levels of Mercury in their habitat, they may have become extinct.

Considering this is the third thread about Mercury poisoning our environment and neither of the other threads received much attention, I hope more people see this and start taking it seriously. Especially since nuclear power doesn't seem to be going anywhere any time soon. Everyone needs to know that Mercury is just as dangerous as radiation poisoning.

posted on Dec, 22 2011 @ 07:11 AM
Trying to locate more information about yesterday's ruling, I also found that Florida's Mercury problem was discussed in 1993. I've copied the entire article below because you never know when it may be removed from the Internet like the 1995 and 1996 articles were.

"Mercury Ruling Likely Will Force Incinerator Changes"

TAVARES — Mercury emissions from Lake County's incinerator at Okahumpka must be reduced if the state follows through with planned standards for emissions.

A debate already is under way over how to do it, and there are only two choices, those involved say: Either put less mercury into the incinerator or take it out of the smoke.

Surprisingly, both opponents and proponents of the incinerator agree on what should be done. They say keep mercury out of the incinerator.

''Keeping heavy metals like mercury out of the waste stream might be the better idea,'' said County Commission Chairman Richard Swartz, a constant critic of the incinerator. ''It is going to be cheaper to eliminate the source going into the incinerator.''

Operators of the incinerator agree.

''I'd say try to get the mercury out through the waste system,'' said Steve Bass, regional director for Ogden Martin Systems, which operates the $79 million incinerator that fired up two years ago.

Bass estimates it would cost $2 million to install a mercury-scrubbing system on the incinerator, with annual operating costs of about $150,000. Taxpayers would bear the cost, and Swartz estimates it may actually cost up to $500,000 annually.

The cheaper approach, they say, is keeping batteries, fluorescent light fixtures and other objects containing mercury out of the incinerator.

A state report says incinerators are the main source of mercury pollution in Florida, although incinerator operators dispute that. The state says incinerators were responsible for a quarter of the 38,369 pounds of mercury emitted by man-made sources in 1990 in Florida.

Mercury has been detected in unhealthy concentrations in fish across the state, prompting health advisories to limit consumption. In excessive levels, mercury threatens the nervous systems of humans and animals.

The state's Environmental Regulation Commission was to have considered the new standards Thursday but postponed its meeting until Aug. 25. Those standards would require substantially lower emissions for Florida's 10 major incinerators, including Lake County's, within about five years.

The standards are based on the levels of mercury removal expected at a new incinerator being built in Lee County near Fort Myers by Ogden Martin.

The planned allowable emission level for mercury would be 70 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter, according to Larry George of the state Department of Environmental Regulation, which drew up the standards. That's a sharp decrease from the current average of about 300 micrograms.

The Lee County incinerator will use a carbon injection system on smokestacks, in which mercury attaches to the carbon and is removed. The Lee County facility will be the first in the nation to use the new technology.

Here is Florida's law associated with the above ruling.

So, let's start talking about Mercury more.

I'll keep searching for yesterday's ruling and post whatever I find.

posted on Dec, 22 2011 @ 07:32 AM
Conducting an ATS search, I was happy to see that the Ibis issue was discussed previously.

Homosexuality in birds linked to mercury poisoning

Mercury poisoning makes male birds homosexual

Seeing as coal-fired power plants, nuclear power plants, incinerators, and lightbulbs are all exposing us to Mercury on a constant basis, it's not difficult to make the argument that homosexuality in humans and animals may be caused by Mercury exposure.

Do government officials know this, so they keep hyping their support for homosexuality to keep people thinking that this many gays and lesbians are normal?

As I stated in a previous post, I believe that nature would cause a few homosexual instances, but as many as we're seeing today? One truly has to wonder. I don't have anything against homosexuals, but I do have issues with government and industry causing changes to humans and animals that wouldn't normally be occuring in such abundance.

posted on Dec, 22 2011 @ 09:14 AM
I can't believe Mercury isn't getting more attention on ATS.

Members weren't drawn to the threads in 2005 or 2006 and it seems as though 2011 isn't much different.

new topics

top topics


log in