It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by nenothtu
Same old same old...
Occupy is actually protesting the government in addition to the 1%, I've posted/threaded this I don't even know how many times now. I'd like to say I could just ignore this BS rhetoric...I'm tired of the same arguments the same posts, same links, new stories...answers have been asked for and given, yet I can't. I simply cannot accept ignorance.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Kali74
AND...
I've said numerous times here at ATS that I agree with the General premise of the movement but think they should do a little house cleaning if they want to gain more support than just a few thousand people at these protests.
There is something seriously wrong when a Star Trek convention attracts 15,000 routinely and when OWS gathers that many they are ecstatic.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by nenothtu
I feel like I have a million times. It's not my fault that people would rather argue with me than actually read what I post and link.
In fact I posted like 5 links of Occupy stories from this week alone, a few pages back...edit on 21-12-2011 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)
DES MOINES — Activists aligned with Occupy Des Moines disrupted a speech by Newt Gingrich at a Statehouse news conference Wednesday to announce two key endorsements for his presidential run.
Gingrich, who served as speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995-99, was endorsed by Iowa House Speaker Kraig Paulsen of Hiawatha and New Hampshire House Speaker William O’Brien at the event.
The two lawmakers credited Gingrich with engineering a Republican takeover of the House, insisting on balanced federal budgets and forcing then-President Bill Clinton into signing welfare reform.
Gingrich then took the podium and was about two minutes into his speech when an Occupy protester seated behind him yelled out “mic check” and three people heckled the speaker. A security detail removed the protesters, who chanted “put people first” as they were taken into the hallway.
(...)
Originally posted by XPLodER
even the haters of OWS on this thread just cant stop talking about them,
they expend energy in this thread and in doing so are debating points to do with OWS
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Reactionary critics of OWS are having trouble assimilating what real democracy looks like... because they've never seen one in action. OWS is the real deal folks, small-d democratic, and they will be back in 2012 to represent the voice of the people. The candidates who ignore popular movements will not stand a chance.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Although I supported the General Premise and still do. I think Many members shot themselves in the foot and turned people off whenever anybody would raise legitimate questions or concerns about activities and associations that were either carried out by OWS members or in OWS's name and were all too often shown the door with the attitude of...
You are either with us or against us
&
We are the 99%
edit on 21-12-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
Which, oddly enough, means WE are doing a damn sight more to get things done than OWS is, even while sitting on our asses drinking beer!
Originally posted by Hawking
I say wait until the resurgence of Occupiers in the spring to make any 'final' callsedit on 21-12-2011 by Hawking because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by XPLodER
even the haters of OWS on this thread just cant stop talking about them,
they expend energy in this thread and in doing so are debating points to do with OWS
Which, oddly enough, means WE are doing a damn sight more to get things done than OWS is, even while sitting on our asses drinking beer!