It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Neutrino and UFO Technology

page: 2
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
If we were to know how to control these Neutrinos (as we now know how to control Nuclear Fission in a Nuclear Reactor) then maybe we can direct these Neutrinos to the right destination where it will be converted back to its original form.


Maybe there's a way to pump a certain amount of energy into them and kind of spin them down (or up) into another dimension, translating them into neutrinos. Then as the energy dissipates after a while - external to time - the neutrinos will "pop" back into ordinary type matter at a given point. Imagine a ball on a roulette wheel. Energy goes in, keeping it in motion above the spinning wheel and external to its frame of reference. When the energy bleeds away, it eventually falls back down into one of the slots (states of matter). Except, of course, the goal would be to not make it random, but get where you want to go. And maybe back.




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:11 PM
link   
If anyone wants to give a shot at testing this theory / technology in their backyard lab they could do so using the following basic tools. The result of this test is not going to make anyone disappear though. But it will certainly might expose you to something exciting.

Warning: Please try this at your own risk and under adult supervision.

1. A Strong Horseshoe Magnet.
2. DC Voltage Batteries of at least 12V
3. Copper Coil that can be wound around the Horseshoe magnet.
4. A fine needle.

Now wind the copper coil around any one of the hands of the Horseshoe Magnet. Connect both the ends to the DC Batteries.

Start the power.

Insert the needle at an angle of 45 degrees to the wound copper coil and watch the tip of the needle glow a faint blue.

If this happens, your battery will be instantly drained.

The result is that a very microscopically small fraction of the tip of the needle is converted to Neutrinos once the field is formed resulting in the faint blue tingle and the draining of the battery.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:14 PM
link   
Another frighting realization of this technology ( matter to neutrino ) is that the military could use it to create artificial earthquakes, tsunamis and all sort of natural calamities REMOTELY.

The military implications are very stealthy.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 

Neutrinos pass through matter without effort. So much so that they are difficult to detect.
How, pray tell, can something without a charge and such low mass have the effects you speak of?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Blue Shift
 


Sounds wonderful but getting any concept or theory to work requires a great deal of scientific work and testing something not possible on a forum such as this. One requires real brainstorming by people of science.

I or you can shoot ideas but we need scientists to try and prove it is possible.

The reason for me create this thread was to point people in a particular direction and see if some bright minds such as yours can come out with solutions.

There are many theories for space and time travel and this is just one of the many.

I wanted to simply share the knowledge I have and if that helps anyone develop a Time Travel device...I would be the most delighted to experience Time Travel in my life time.

Cheers
edit on 21-12-2011 by guyfrom2007 because: added more information



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


If we learn how to convert matter to neutrinos, the military can use this to dematerialize parts of the tectonic plates within a certain region or country and this would shift them resulting in an earthquake.

The same method can be used to generate other calamities that seem natural but are actually artificially created.

And if the UFO people have this technology they could do this anywhere on the earth. They could simply play GOD.


edit on 21-12-2011 by guyfrom2007 because: added more information



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 


Does your neutrino theory explain the instant stops, starts and 90 degree turns of a flying saucer?

My speculation, is that the photon scanner/projector, on the flying saucer has an extremely fast shutter; that can block or send the light photons to the black hole dust parabolic plate on the bottom of the starship.

The photon emitter exhaust port has the ability to rotate around the perimeter of the disc, thus providing a system for almost instant directional vectors; including instant stops and starts, 90 degree turns, etc,etc.

Two, top and bottom exhaust emitters, would also be required for vertical/zenith vectors

The black hole dust plate, on the saucer, should be sufficent enough to power a electromagnetic shield; surrounding the starship.

Thanks,

Erno86



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:35 PM
link   
One word. Hyperspace.
If I need to supply a second line.
It would be Billy Mieres.
A fourth line line will be unnecessary.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Erno86
 


I believe the flying saucer technology is a smoke screen for the actual technology. From my research on UFOs, most of the so called flying saucers have turned out to be Military Projects such as the drones that are now coming to commercial production.

And even if suppose the flying saucers are Alien Spacecrafts, the technology would certainly be different from the one used for Inter-Stellar or Space Time Travel.

Maybe the UFOs are robotic probing spacecrafts like the drones we use in Afghanistan / Iran not the top end Alien Technology.

So even if they are captured, their latest technology is always safe.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 05:12 PM
link   
This seems fascinating. I am quite young and do not study physics in a career sense, but what I am reading seems to have some truth to it. At least thats how I feel. What else can you elaborate on?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erno86
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 




Since the black hole dust is to small to absorb the light photons, it has to be ejected from the baseplate, from some kind of emitter, that provides thrust for the starship, at the speed of light from the spent photons.





Oops! To get thrust by emitting something, the something needs mass. And photons are massless. Therefore, their rest energy equals their inertial energy. But no mass. A jet or a rocket obtains thrust by emitting particles that have mass.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by F4guy

Originally posted by Erno86
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 




Since the black hole dust is to small to absorb the light photons, it has to be ejected from the baseplate, from some kind of emitter, that provides thrust for the starship, at the speed of light from the spent photons.





Oops! To get thrust by emitting something, the something needs mass. And photons are massless. Therefore, their rest energy equals their inertial energy. But no mass. A jet or a rocket obtains thrust by emitting particles that have mass.



A light photon is still a particle, which a black hole has enough gravitatonal pull to suck that photon into its Event Horizion. If a photon has no mass, why can a black hole pull that light photon? On a few giant black holes the photons are ejected from the black hole. The Higgs boson effect, if proven by the Cern, could give the light photons a false sense of mass. What about the photon engines that are proposed for planetary travel by the U.S.?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Erno86
 

A black hole (any mass actually) bends spacetime. Light follows the curve of spacetime, no mass necessary.

The photons which may be emitted by black holes (Hawking radiation) have never been observed.

Photons do have momentum (sort of), a very very small amount of momentum so they could be used for a propulsion system but it would require ridiculous amounts of energy. Do you mean ion engines? I don't think photon engines are proposed for practical use.
www.5min.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erno86

Originally posted by F4guy

Originally posted by Erno86
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 










A light photon is still a particle, which a black hole has enough gravitatonal pull to suck that photon into its Event Horizion. If a photon has no mass, why can a black hole pull that light photon? On a few giant black holes the photons are ejected from the black hole. The Higgs boson effect, if proven by the Cern, could give the light photons a false sense of mass. What about the photon engines that are proposed for planetary travel by the U.S.?


Do you really have enough time for a full course in general relativity? A black hole does not "suck" in a photon because of any photon mass. The mass of a black hole warps space-time to such an extent that even at c, it can't escape. I'm sure I don't need to do the math for you to show the difference in photon spheres between Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes
And noone has promoted a "photon" propulsion system with a straight face since it was shown that the Sanger engine had prohibitive collimazation problems, even using matter-antimatter gamma ray photon generation. Interest now is with ion or plasma propulsion.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
reply to post by Erno86
 


I believe the flying saucer technology is a smoke screen for the actual technology. From my research on UFOs, most of the so called flying saucers have turned out to be Military Projects such as the drones that are now coming to commercial production.

And even if suppose the flying saucers are Alien Spacecrafts, the technology would certainly be different from the one used for Inter-Stellar or Space Time Travel.

Maybe the UFOs are robotic probing spacecrafts like the drones we use in Afghanistan / Iran not the top end Alien Technology.

So even if they are captured, their latest technology is always safe.






I have to partially disagree with your opinion. I .... for one --- Would not want to send one of my precious robots to another habitable planet, only to have it possibly go haywire, shot down, captured and reversed engineered.

The new drone technology, is a relatively new technology, so how can you explain the approx. 5 percent of unexplained UFO sightings since WW 2?

You can put my only UFO sighting, in the unexplained category, which I witnessed one night back in 1976, approx. 40 miles west of Washington D.C.

Can you say that I witnessed a secret U.S. Military flying craft? --- When the low altitude bluish white light at 10 p.m., heading in a westerly direction, from Washington D.C, approx. speed: 5,000 mph. One minute later, an approx. 1,000 foot diameter lighted fiery red fusion plasma Foofighter,--- with no fiery tail--- about a mile away, approx. 40 mph, on a perpendicular landing descent to Earth.

Homie don't think so.

BTW --- If anybody has a question, about how can a flying saucer function without any lighted photon source; on a dark forbidden planet?

The flying saucer generates its own lighted photon fiery-red fusion plasma surrounding the starship, encased in a magnetic shield, with a secondary magnetic shield, protecting the starship from the fusion plasma.

Cheers,

Erno86



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by F4guy
 


If you took a trip to a black hole, and had the chance to go past its Event Horizon, you're going to literally get pulled in and taken to never never land.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Phage --- Thanks, for the interesting link, as always, I have a deep respect for your views and opinions.


Happy holidays,

Erno86



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 07:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Erno86
 

Thank you for the compliment and the holiday wishes.
The same to you.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 07:35 PM
link   
I have always thought traveling at the speed of light was more of a concept for Sci- Fi films rather than an actual speed we would achieve to explore the universe. There is to much debris, astroids, planets, black holes, suns, gravitaional foreces in general that can effect something speeding across the universe.

To me it makes more sense that the universe has gravitaional loop holes like worm holes that is like a switch board to pass from one area to another, evan stargates seem more practicle. But this gets into interdimesional physics and crazy ideas like that, thats main stream science has no clue exsists.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 07:35 PM
link   
I have always thought traveling at the speed of light was more of a concept for Sci- Fi films rather than an actual speed we would achieve to explore the universe. There is to much debris, astroids, planets, black holes, suns, gravitaional foreces in general that can effect something speeding across the universe.

To me it makes more sense that the universe has gravitaional loop holes like worm holes that is like a switch board to pass from one area to another, evan stargates seem more practicle. But this gets into interdimesional physics and crazy ideas like that, thats main stream science has no clue exsists.


clicked twice...lagg..plz remove this post.
edit on 21-12-2011 by TheMur because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join