It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Neutrino and UFO Technology

page: 1
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:00 AM
link   
To understand UFO technology, we first need to think in terms of a completely different Physics. Till recently, it was thought that nothing can go faster than the speed of light.

But scientists from CERN were able to detect Neutrinos that travel faster than the speed of light.

So let us leave behind existing physics and think of what we have not yet discovered.

I would like to start with the subject of Neutrinos. I had done some research many years ago on this subject and posted my theories on various forums and would like to bring to light this research as I am finding more and more evidence that what I had thought could well become a fact.

I had predicted that neutrinos can travel faster than light and that has been proved true recently.

Likewise, I had predicted that UFO technology would need to involve physics that understands how to convert and control matter to neutrinos.

Today, I found an important link and want to share it with ATS . And I would request people to take backup of this material as I have done as it may be taken down once they come to know it is all over ATS.

aether.lbl.gov...

This link lists out the sources of neutrinos and one of the source is UFO!

So once again my predictions are proving true.

Comments please.




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
This link lists out the sources of neutrinos and one of the source is UFO!


not yet...


Detecting UFO Neutrinos with the KM3
The KM3 detector can be used to detect as yet unkown sources of high energy neutrinos.

Introduction
Due to its great penetrating power neutrino astronomy may detect sources and classes of sources that have yet to be observed since they are opaque to photons.

Scientific Motivation
Unknown Astrophysical and Cosmological Sources
It is always exciting and good to open a new window of observation. Each time this has been done in the past, new discoveries have been made.


aether.lbl.gov...




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:13 AM
link   
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 





So once again my predictions are proving true.


Could you post a link to the prediction you made so we can see if they are comming true



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:15 AM
link   
The detection of FTL neutrinos at CERN has not been confirmed.
www.csmonitor.com...

The reference to UFOs and aliens seems to be in reference to this:

ET could, for example, send out a neutrino beam at precise (and non-naturally occurring) energy levels that would be sure to catch a scientist's eye.

"If there's a civilization, like our civilization, which is at the stage of setting up large neutrino detectors, then one would see this signal of a unique signature and you would right away say: 'What the heck is going on here? This is certainly not a natural signature.' This is something that would really get your attention on the very first (detection.) And then on the second one you'd be saying: 'Huh? What in the world is going on here?'"

Source

edit on 12/21/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:18 AM
link   
I had posted comments on an earlier ATS thread in 2007. However my original research was done in 1987-1988 when I was a student of physics at college.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply to post by Vandalour
 



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Well a second test was done and the same result was obtained but yes as per traditional science, there has to be more confirmations.

But I am optimistic that is already happened or will happen and someone will win a nobel prize for this.

reply to post by Phage
 



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:31 AM
link   


That's why aliens use them to scan things.


Whaa-what?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:32 AM
link   
Very interesting...

They seem to be getting closer to a solution.

Question: how would neutrino based technology work in a ufo?

As a prime equation of a power source? Sustainable energy?

Or, A by product of said power source? Tranformation of a property state were in thermodynamicly, neutrino release happens? Burn off?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 10:43 AM
link   
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 


Aliens wouldn't need neutrinos even if they were proved to be tachyons, which I am confident will not be confirmed by other high-energy physics laboratories. According to many reports by abductees, they communicate telepathically and use wormhole technology to reduce the duration of their travel in deep space.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 12:16 PM
link   
You might find this interesting:

SQUID (Superconducting quantum interference device)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   
reply to post by xpoq47
 

There is nothing about neutrinos or UFOs in that article.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Neutrinos notwithstanding, demonstrating in the laboratory that photons can be extracted from the zero-point field seems relevant enough to the theory that UFOs use a combination of zero-point energy and zero-point propulsion.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:29 PM
link   
reply to post by xpoq47
 

No it isn't.

The capture of virtual particles (as predicted by quantum mechanics) doesn't have much to do with "using" zero-point energy for anything. It would take something not involved with quantum mechanics to do so. Zero-point is the lowest energy state a system can obtain (that's where the "zero" comes from), it cannot be extracted from the system. The photon experiment put energy into the system in order to capture the quanta.
edit on 12/21/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   
People have been postulating about stuff such as Wormholes, etc. But all of this is far fetched as creating a wormhole with require huge amount of energy and given our precarious energy situation, that seems very far fetched. Unless we learn how to harness other forms of energy such as that from the sun....not same as the solar as we know and use currently.

But the stuff I am talking about does not need enormous amount of energy.We already know how to harness fusion and fission energy and Neutrinos are bound mostly by weaker forces that we have not yet discovered on how to generate.

And once we know how to do that, we could have a Matrix style telephone booth at every nook and corner. Just dial a number and in a fraction of a second you are in Tokyo in another telephone booth. Dematerialized to Neutrinos where you were and rematerialized to your original form in another place.

And if one needs to go to the nearest star, first send a drone / robots and then establish an outpost and then send the real people once communication and transport is foolproof.

If we observe closely UFO technology, they employ the same method. Initially they sent in drones or robots and then the real aliens come over.

Again, we have observed UFOs to vanish or dematerialize in an instant or exhibit electromagnetic disturbances.

The technology/force that is used to convert matter to neutrinos makes use of both electromagnetic and gravitational forces. I call it Gravitational Electrical Effects. And I had derived an equation for this in 1987 and posted (there was no email those days) it to some of the major US universities hoping I would get an admission.

But I never heard from them and my focus turned to learning something that I could make some money (computer science).

Now, any theory or force that one speculates should either be able to be demonstrated in a lab or should be existing in nature. As the lab experiment would require superconducting magnets and proper equipment that I did not have, I decided to find proof in nature.

And I predicted that when a star dies or explodes, a burst of neutrinos is released and this was exhibited by Supernova 1987A and the results were made public in 1991 much after my prediction.

I had also explained how the Star exploded and how sunspots and earth spots are formed using the same theory.

And then when I came across the phenomenon of UFO'S. I said oh my gosh. This is how they travel between the stars. By converting their spaceships and themselves to Neutrinos and blasting the neutrinos to their destination which is captured by communication outposts already setup (such as on the moon ).

I then wrote that even if an advanced civilization were to learn how to convert matter to neutrinos and blast them to their destinations, the special theory or relativity comes in to effect which means if they return back to their original planet, time would have flown by there and it would be still be meaningless to travel huge distances.

Which means, there would be a need to make these particles travel faster then light so they can tweak their arrival dates and timings by going into the future or the past. Basically engage in Time Travel.

And then I predicted that certain types of Neutrinos could travel faster than light and that is why we would do not detect their presence if we were to conduct and experiment. AS the neutrinos would travel into the future and the experiment is in the present.

So now if Neutrinos can travel faster than light and those who have the technology to convert to matter to neutrinos and the reverse and use it to undertake Time Travel, how does the laws of physics allow that.

How can all three states of space time exist at the same time. And I predicted the existence of parallel universe when I made my favorite quote, "For every infinitesimally fraction of a second of the present there exists a past and the future". This means for each existing universe of the present there is exactly a parallel universe in the past the future. And that is how time travel can be possible.

So in all I had made the following predictions based on my preliminary research between 1987-1991.

1. When a Star explodes as a SuperNova, a burst of Neutrinos will be released.
2. Neutrinos can travel faster than light and thus we can engage in time travel.
3. There are parallel universes in existence at the same time.
4. UFO technology is about converting matter to Neutrinos.

I had also made one more prediction which is yet to be proved or atleast discussed and that is "We never die"

Meaning, once we die in one time space, we continue to exist in another.No. this is not about reincarnation.

We continue to live the same stupid life all over again in another time space.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:55 PM
link   
here is the link to the original GEE theory.

I would not say this theory is the final word on the technology that powers UFOS but it could be a starting point.

GEE Theory



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
I am no longer a researcher in these matters though I wish to take this subject again once I retire from my current occupation. Recently one of my more mundane down to earth inventions (related to computer science and online security in particular) was judged as one of the finalist for Global Security Challenge competition and won other international awards too. I do not want to openly disclose myself at this point of time though.



Originally posted by guyfrom2007
here is the link to the original GEE theory.

I would not say this theory is the final word on the technology that powers UFOS but it could be a starting point.

GEE Theory




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by micpsi
Aliens wouldn't need neutrinos even if they were proved to be tachyons, which I am confident will not be confirmed by other high-energy physics laboratories. According to many reports by abductees, they communicate telepathically and use wormhole technology to reduce the duration of their travel in deep space.


Not only that, assorted strange reports on the fringes of the UFO field suggest that the consciousness/telepathy component actually works with the mechanism of UFOs to "shift" ships and occupants from one place or time to another without the need to actually move particles or exchange energy.

It's like, how do you know where you are? Well, you perceive it and you structure and define your reality around your perception. But if you could shift your perception so that you're seeing something (or sometime) else, how is that different than actually being there? The trick is to create the place you want to go in your mind, and then "be" there.

There are obviously problems with such a scenario, not the least of which is being able to accurately define what's happening given the semantic limitations of how we define our realities.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


For the virtual particle to have contributed anything at all to the creation of the detectable photons, it must have absorbed less energy from the system than that of the photons created, resulting in a gross energy profit. Net energy profit would be achieved only if the system were efficient enough (if waste were less than gross profit). An analogy would be lending 99 cents to each potential penny donor to get around a minimum legal contribution of one dollar (assuming transaction cost of less than a penny a pop [to achieve net gain]).

Theoretical work on zero-point propulsion is discussed here:
Calphysics.org



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by guyfrom2007
 


I wonder, if it could be possible, that you may not need neutrinos to power a flying saucer with beyond the speed of light velocities thru the void of space. Instead... the average light photon would suffice as fuel, to power a saucer, that sports a magnetic shield surrounding the starship. A scanner that detects light photons from a distant star, funnels the photons to a photon hungry ceramic baseplate than is infused with dust from a exploded mini-black hole from a refinery.

Since the black hole dust is to small to absorb the light photons, it has to be ejected from the baseplate, from some kind of emitter, that provides thrust for the starship, at the speed of light from the spent photons.

Since the starship is already going at the speed of light, you just feed the black hole dust plate with more light photons, whereas you can increase the speed of the flying saucer, exponentially, to many times the speed of light!!!


Cheers,

Erno86


edit on 21-12-2011 by Erno86 because: grammar

edit on 21-12-2011 by Erno86 because: deleted a couple of words

edit on 21-12-2011 by Erno86 because: added a word

edit on 21-12-2011 by Erno86 because: deleted a word



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   
Neutrinos are not required to push a spaceship according to my theories. The spaceship is itself converted to Neutrinos using this technology. And once the spaceship is converted to Neutrinos, they would zap at speeds greater than speed of light.

If we were to know how to control these Neutrinos (as we now know how to control Nuclear Fission in a Nuclear Reactor) then maybe we can direct these Neutrinos to the right destination where it will be converted back to its original form.

So, we do not really need a space ship to travel through space using this technology.

reply to post by Erno86
 




top topics



 
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join