posted on Dec, 20 2011 @ 02:03 PM
reply to post by Tea4One
What better frontman to run against Obama?
Seriously though, his stance is not racist, it is constitutionalist. He wants to do away with the entire D.O.E., because it isn't the Federal
Govt's purvay, and it has been an epic failure. He isn't "pro-segragation," he is just anti-government involvement.
This same old tired argument has been brought up time and time again. It also goes for his other stances, such as claiming he is
"pro-legalization." He is definitely not "pro" anything, he just wants the Federal Government out of the Nanny business. He wants personal
responsibility and state's rights.
You can keep tossing this info out there, we've all seen it plenty of times, but it just isn't true. Some people will choose to make the leap and
believe it, while others will choose to look into what Ron Paul stands for and realize this is just part of his overall stance on government.
I choose the side of personal responsibility, small government, and state's rights. YMMV