It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
We can pretend all day the Taliban "didn't exist" until 1993, but the seeds for their formation were sown in the American imperialism and interventionism of the 80's and 90's.
Among those Reagan and Bush provided material aid to:
Profile: Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
Former mujahideen leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar is one of the most controversial figures in modern Afghan history.
A former prime minister, he is remembered chiefly for his role in the bloody civil war of the 1990s.
Mr Hekmatyar is currently in a tenuous alliance with the Taliban, although both sides remain suspicious of each other.
In 2003, the US state department designated him as a terrorist, accusing him of taking part in and supporting attacks by al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
We can pretend all day the Taliban "didn't exist" until 1993, but the seeds for their formation were sown in the American imperialism and interventionism of the 80's and 90's.
Among those Reagan and Bush provided material aid to:
Profile: Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
...
Mr Hekmatyar is currently in a tenuous alliance with the Taliban, although both sides remain suspicious of each other.
...
These textbooks will teach tolerance and respect for human dignity, instead of indoctrinating students with fanaticism and bigotry
www.foxnews.com...
In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.
The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system's core curriculum.
Even the Taliban used the American-produced books, though the radical movement scratched out human faces in keeping with its strict fundamentalist code.
www.washingtonpost.com...
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
You can say or believe whatever youd like.
Its a fact that Osama was an asset of the CIA
and that they helped recruit fighters to repel the Russians in Afghanistan.
To pretend that the US was/is not intimate with Al-Qaeda or Al-CIAeda is laughable.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by nenothtu
So there was no Operation Cyclone,
Osama Bin Laden, Tim Osman, was not a CIA asset and the US government has nothing to do with Osama or Al-CIAeda.
Well, Im sorry, but you still havent convinced me.
May I suggest you increase the usage of the word "damn" and add some more exclamation points.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by nenothtu
Its not a misspelling at all. Al-CIAeda is a reference to our CIA working with Osama Bin Laden, funding, naming and recruiting the organization known as Al-Qaeda.
Is that clear enough or are you still confused?
edit on 23-12-2011 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by nenothtu
I'm going to clue you in on a little secret.
The US government hides its activities and get this, sometimes they even lie.
Crazy I know, who woulda thunk it?
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
Sure thing.
Nothing makes more sense than taking the word of an anonymous stooge on a website about conspiracy theories.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by nenothtu
Its not a misspelling at all. Al-CIAeda is a reference to our CIA working with Osama Bin Laden, funding, naming and recruiting the organization known as Al-Qaeda.
Is that clear enough or are you still confused?
edit on 23-12-2011 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Ah. I see. It's not a misspelling - it's an intentionally wrongful spelling borne of fantasy, based upon events which never occurred except in diseased minds, constructed with intent to mislead and misinform - a construct also known as "propaganda".
Got it.
edit on 2011/12/24 by nenothtu because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sonnny1
CIAnenothtu?
Its official!