It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Would you rather he left it to the church or the government or some other evil organisation?
To us it sounds silly but if you have no family left to give it to, why not?
ETA Insanity, not to mention illegality, is to interfere with the last will and testament of a person of sound mind and body
is to interfere with the last will and testament of a person of sound mind and body
The German Shepard was left with $106M
I'd say the trustees will be left with the trust fund upon the death of the dog with it's own staff receiving a portion.
Is our society so bat # crazy that we can honestly leave people starving, for the sake of this insane libertarian extremism that allows people to allocate their life's fortune to their pets?
Originally posted by dreamingawake
I seen the article lately on the cat left millions. And thought; It's really up to the owner of the animal and millions, but yes the reasons is a bit...let's say, much Sure, leave a good amount for the pet to be taken care of for the rest of their time being. Seems that the people are confused to even have no relatives, friends to leave it to, so they decide on their pet vs charity(for example) or letting it go to the government. I'd personally leave it to charity, of whom I trust. In their case it'd probably be animal shelters.