It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Italian scientists have conducted a series of advanced experiments which, they claim, show that the marks on the shroud – purportedly left by the imprint of Christ's body – could not possibly have been faked with technology that was available in the medieval period.
The research will be an early Christmas present for shroud believers, but is likely to be greeted with scepticism by those who doubt that the sepia-coloured, 14ft-long cloth dates from Christ's crucifixion 2,000 years ago.
the Turin Shroud – is not a medieval forgery but could be the authentic burial robe."
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by Daedal
As a Christian, this really is not something that would make a Merry Christmas for me. I believe that the shroud is a fake and is nothing more than a distraction from the truth. As new testament believers we are supposed to have faith and not rely on signs.
Nice find.
Originally posted by Snippy23
reply to post by Daedal
Thanks for highlighting this one, but it would be a big help if you could link to the 'study', and maybe point out who conducted it. It's an extreme claim (though more likely than it either being the image of Jacques Molay or Leonardo da Vinci!) and it'll need thinking about.
Thanks
There, I fixed it...good grief thousands of people were crucified...even should it prove to be an authentic burial shroud, (and I don't believe it would be) how on earth could they factually say...that it belonged to ONE in particular..lol I think they should do some DNA testing They won't do that because the DNA would shatter the myth...
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by Daedal
As a Christian, this really is not something that would make a Merry Christmas for me. I believe that the shroud is a fake and is nothing more than a distraction from the truth. As new testament believers we are supposed to have faith and not rely on signs.
Nice find.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Even if they are correct and the marks on the sheet were made by a human body its a huuuge leap of faith (and imagination) to then say the body was definitely Jesus Christ who was the real son of a Christian God who had magic powers.
edit on 19-12-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by krossfyter
how reliable/reputable is "Vatican Insider"????
Originally posted by ToneDeaf
______________________
Realistically the shroud is more like this than the
reversed photo-shopped version :
The acids from the body would have discolored the
white linen, not the reverse as deceptively portrayed.
(so from the start there has been misinformation going on)
______________________edit on 19/12/11 by ToneDeaf because: (no reason given)