It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to the Globe, long-standing tensions between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton reached the boiling point during a recent golf outing at Andrews Air Force Base.
According to multiple unnamed sources, Clinton has been confiding to close pals that Obama is "the worst President ever" and his presidency is a "sinking ship" that is "taking the Democratic party and the country down with him," and when Obama confronted him on the comments, Clinton looked him in the eye and said; "Yes, it's a fact." The Globe reports: "At that point, the source adds, Obama went ballistic and told the ex-Prez; 'Then you are a racist and no different than the rest of them.'"
Originally posted by FlyersFan
And the National Enquirer is a tabloid but thanks to them, we all know what kind of a person John Edwards is. The tabloid got razzed and called names ...but they stuck with it and he was exposed. To think .. Edwards came close to being POTUS. YIKES!......(snip)
Originally posted by Schkeptick
Why hold Clinton to a different standard than Edwards?
Originally posted by DiddlyDeePotatoes
if this is true , then the very fact that clinton did not mention race ... just shows that obama is a racist for even thinking of such a thing .
But , since the clintons have more power than obama , and play a part in controling him , id say its BS.
Originally posted by pointr97
reply to post by DoctorSatan
Clinton was a hound dog, but I have worked in the media, and the priority of a story went, Foreign, Domestic, Budget, and Sex Scandal.....This is a simplicity of the outline, but boiled down.....Meaning, as a journalist, we would much rather scamper after a Foreign story vs Domestic......From the journalist side, it was a 'bigger' story.......So with this math
If the only thing that the MSM could hit Clinton on was a few sex scandals......they were digging pretty low down on the food chain to get anything.....Which with the reverse logic, means that they couldn't find anything higher up the food chain to hit him on......So he was Solid on his Foreign and Domestic issues......So instead of just dogging him as a hound dog, which what politician isn't?....Evaluate him as a President, he didn't do to bad....This administration, I can not honestly see a bit of difference from the last one.....as a citizen, I feel absolutely no difference in my life, my family's life or my country....and he ran on some kind of 'change' something or other....
edit-wait a damn minute......carter wasn't great.....but seriously....carter was worse than bush? or obama?.....How? Carter was an ambigious president, didn't do anything good, but really didn't do anything bad, just kind served his time.edit on 18-12-2011 by pointr97 because: (no reason given)