I'm not really getting where he advised violence against peaceful people anywhere? The entire discussion is about taxation and the different methods of taxation in correlation to the perceived value of service to taxes rendered as a percentage to income and usage....
There is no coercive action by government which will have the same beneficent effects of voluntary transactions in competitive markets,
Which also means "There is no compulsory or required by law from a government to demand taxation for public services that have the same beneficent effects of voluntary taxation"
It goes into a more archaic (old) Classical Liberal theory of no taxes but the Government will uphold a series of public services (such as medical care and education) that, when you decide or have to use it, you pay a tax in the form of a fee. this way only those volunteering to use a service pay for the service. This is obviously impossible in a competitive market. You destroy competition, eventually the Government is the only game in town which leads to eventual failings of quality due to lack of competition.
This theory is the basic underlying ancestor of the "flat tax" via sales tax .. you only pay a tax for what you spend, if you want lower taxes you spend less (and end up saving double from taxes and lower consumption)..
He goes on to explain that compulsory (coercive) taxes on consumer goods such as gas while seem fair because everyone pays them are in fact unevenly distributed.. to many factors are included to determine the fairness of the taxation .. hence a flat tax on all goods purchased is one of the best forms of taxation as far as " perceived value per dollar paid in taxation"
