Asking for members opinions...Do you think the Coverup of existance of E.T. to be good or bad?

The coverup is wrong. the human race deserves to know about aliens.
We are not babies anymore....and we have lost too much time talking if aliens exist while we have tons of prove that aliens DO EXiST.

Originally posted by Donegal_TDI
I have been doing a bit of thinking Split since my last post, and I think the coverup/non_disclosure agenda is being perpetrated currently by both sides, and the prime reason for this is earths militiary is now in a position that it can begin using ET tehnology, where as 2000/200 years ago humans were not much of a threat, and had little use for optic fibre and the like.
The Militiary keep the lid on this because they want to get their lecherous hands on better tech. ET keeps the lid on this because of the Militiary. I believe that ET were more open with humanity many centuries ago when we were nol a threat. Non-Disclosure is bad, but necessary, and the militiary are entirely to blame.
More later.

You are wise, Donegal. But behind that truth there is another one. It is the money that urges them to continue their corrupt ways. For if we all knew the real truth, is it not possible (even probable) that this knowledge would usher in a new era of peace and harmony? Perhaps, they display in the sky to be seen by us from afar because they know most would be utterly terrified and confused if they landed in broad daylight in an inner city. Others may attempt to worship them. They might say He has returned in fulfillment of the scriptures! It would be chaos...unless we weren't afraid.

reply to post by mbkennel


those who know the truth, know there is no way to compete with them. there is no incentive to go against the top ranking thinkers and be destroyed by it (or at least a little wounded). no reason to get people worked up when we have no weapons that work on their craft according to many fighter pilots and nuclear launch specialists. the incentive is to shut up and learn from their recovered technology. any scrap of what they've got could translate into a huge advantage for our military. how would they look if they came out and said we're basically scavengers and have no idea what they want? or maybe they do, and that's what scares them. what if it's peace?

reply to post by charlyv


Very perceptive reply! I like how you worded it. This is a very real danger of disclosure....right or wrong....you go to fast of wind the rubber band too tight before releasing it....the rubber band SNAPS! This is the issue and this is the problem of the coverup....even if new people in the Agency thought the time would be right....it will never be right!

It has to be done slowly and systematicly deliberate....or else.....SNAP! Split Infinity

reply to post by LightWatcher


Please look at page 1 post...5 I belive...I forgot to add something to the question that will satisfy your statement.
Split Infinity

Originally posted by LightWatcher

Originally posted by mbkennel


It is likely a craft would be designed to account for known natural hazards like solar and cosmic radiation. A very high-powered, but still single-frequency monochromatic microwave is not a naturally occurring phenomenon and in physics is totally different from solar radiation. Always in engineering there are tradeoffs---you can make something robust to X but at what cost in performance and at what cost in cost?

Actually, that is not true. Astrophysical masers have been known for some time. Sources include active galactic nuclei and molecular clouds. They are natural occuring sources.

Sure, but they'd be dealt with the same way submariners deal with undersea volcanoes: geographical avoidance.
Our system was probably marked in some old charts as "boring ordinary star, excitable but harmless monkeys on planet 3" and no special ship is needed.

It may be a little bit like Jane Goodall going into the jungle and being surprised one day that the Gorillas in the Mist made themselves a shotgun.

My point on the two craft involved in the incident at Roswell and another at a further site....were that these craft were intermediate Solar System and Planet roving craft usng a form of Gravitic drive but not a Fold Space type drive.

These craft are not designed to go Interstellar Distances.....they have a larger carrier craft that they are transported from star system to star system.

They would have some form of shielding....probably not of an electromagnetic type but more exotic to penetrate water atmosphere and space debris.

Split Infinity

Trying to explain the logic behind a coverup of this magnitude is extremely difficult, so difficult it in fact undermines the entire notion of a coverup. A premise offered by the film Intruders suggests that, whilst they are aware of the visitations and origins of these objects, they may not understand the reasons why they are here; they don't have the answers and when they did they would disclose it. It makes sense if you think about it.

Originally posted by Shino
Trying to explain the logic behind a coverup of this magnitude is extremely difficult, so difficult it in fact undermines the entire notion of a coverup. A premise offered by the film Intruders suggests that, whilst they are aware of the visitations and origins of these objects, they may not understand the reasons why they are here; they don't have the answers and when they did they would disclose it. It makes sense if you think about it.

In fact it is the opposite of what would qualify as a status quo that "makes sense". Because if the Higher Intelligence situation is covered up, it means that they are hiding something, or preventing some kind of bad effects as they know some new knowledge would be very disruptive.

The reason that it is not common knowledge that Higher Intelligences are visiting us, is because it is being very actively hidden from us. If you read good books about the topic, you will find many examples of "Men in Black" intervention, or other special agents, who use several technique (mostly harmless) to make it clear that it is not acceptable to talk about it, and that worse things may happen if they do not stop telling the world.

For this reason, as long as you are ready to trust the many people reporting such encounters, it is a clear signal for me that forces are actively seeking to silence the truth.

...Do you think the Coverup of existance of E.T. to be good or bad?

I don't but I'm getting quite sure they do. There's one video that I'd suggest those looking for answers view at utube.
For those who decide to spend an hour viewing it I'd suggest freezing the documents shown toward tha last fifteen min and reading all of it. The narrator only narrates a paragraph or two, reading all of the content answers, in my opinion, alot toward this OPs thread-question.

www.bing.com...#

Decoy

Is being immoral bad or good?
Such is the case.
Has the government made any official decree about UFOs or ETs?
Truman said UFOs seems to be in the news lately.
Thats it.
The people that dig up sources would have links from government web sites posted.
NASA is usually searching for water.
Where is this existence of E.T. concern coming from?
So the story about ETs is from warmongers and unwitting supporters or what in
the general sense of the word are agents hiding the details that would change the
world as they know it but not necessarily for the rest of the world.