It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
According to passengers' accounts to television station WPTV (http://(link tracking not allowed)/sewEuh), the first woman was kicked off the flight after complaining to a flight attendant about how he handled her overhead baggage. The second one said she was removed after asking for help with a broken seat. And the third said she was shown the door after complaining about the removal of the first two.
None was charged with a crime.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
As an ex-Navy man, I've long been an interested observer of what happens when cowardly and incompetent people are invested with authority. And this story is a perfect example.
First one is kicked off for complaining about how a flight attendant handled her overhead baggage.
Second one kicked off for asking for help with a broken seat.
Third one kicked off after complaining about the other two being kicked off.
WTF??!!
And that's according to the reports of other passengers--not some lame excuses made up by the women in question.
Ahem... "None [of the women] was charged with a crime." Well, thank God for that, anyway....
www.sfgate.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
First one is kicked off for complaining about how a flight attendant handled her overhead baggage.
Second one kicked off for asking for help with a broken seat.
Third one kicked off after complaining about the other two being kicked off.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
Doesn't matter.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
It's emblematic of a much larger pattern. Too much authority has been given to aircrews, and they've been abusing it for years.
Indeed, that pattern is emblematic of an even much larger pattern--and it includes teachers and school administrators, child protective services, homeowner associations, security guards.... When small people are given big authority, it always turns out bad. Not knowing how and when--specifically not having been *taught* how and when--to exercise authority is the root problem.
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
reply to post by K1771gnorance
I'm inclined to agree with you. If we could go back in time, we would probably see all three throwing a tantrum fit.
It's very unlikely that the attendants would have reacted this way without good reason.
A spokeswoman for AirTran parent company Southwest Airlines Co. said Tuesday that the women were booked onto new flights and given compensation as "a gesture of goodwill for their inconvenience."
Originally posted by K1771gnorance
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
Doesn't matter.
What doesn't matter? Treating people with disrespect and a bad attitude?
. . .
Sounds more like you have a problem with authority.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Can anyone name one single business that compensates it's customers if they are removed for acting like morons? That simply does not happen. No company will eat the cost for a customer that deserved to be thrown out. That whole idea is beyond stupid.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Ex_CT2
The term color of law applies to individuals who are agents of the government (Police / Sheriff / FBI / etc). Depending on state, security personell could fall under that.
Private employees of a business do not. A priovate business does not have to have any reason to deny service to any person for any reason.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Ex_CT2
The term color of law applies to individuals who are agents of the government (Police / Sheriff / FBI / etc). Depending on state, security personell could fall under that.
Private employees of a business do not. A priovate business does not have to have any reason to deny service to any person for any reason.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by MrWendal
Can anyone name one single business that compensates it's customers if they are removed for acting like morons? That simply does not happen. No company will eat the cost for a customer that deserved to be thrown out. That whole idea is beyond stupid.
Lots actually... The key phrase that is used is called theft by deceit or fraud, your choice. When a business engages in behavior that allows them to collect money from a willing buyer, only to change the rules at the last minute in order to deny the product while retaining their money.
If there is enough behavior of that type coming from a business / industry, we can delve into the RICO statutes (racketeering and criminal enterprise).
Hence ther eason they were booked on other flights.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
reply to post by K1771gnorance
Doesn't matter. It's emblematic of a much larger pattern. Too much authority has been given to aircrews, and they've been abusing it for years.