posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 08:34 AM
reply to post by FlyersFan
Explanation: I didn't call you a "sick puppy" ... I simply asked you!
You however have called 2 members sick puppies so far in this thread and as a gold trim member I expect more and better from you ok!
My proof ...
Exhibit A] reply to post by FlyersFan
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
Mcvleigh was a patriot and hero.ell
You are one sick puppy.
The dead children and their parents give testimony to just the opposite.
Exhibit B] reply to post by FlyersFan
reply to post by OmegaLogos
And you are a sick puppy too. :shk:
Exhibit C] reply to post by OmegaLogos
Because if you endorse the using of innocent and non consenting child human shields at a valid military target, then exactly who is a 'sick
Please raise your game!
The people of the USA are NOT at war with the FBI.
I think the innocent people [such as the children] at Waco would disagree ...
Upon the ATF's failure to execute the search warrant, a siege was initiated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
A day care center is NOT a valid military target.
I 100% AGEE! No arguments from me on THAT issue ... BUT the FBI building certainly was a valid military target. The presence of the day care was
American civilians are NOT the enemy.
LMAO ... the USA is in so many wars that I am forced to cherry pick some examples where American civilians are considered the enemy.
War on Terror!
TSA and airport security!
Need I go on?
Their children are NOT the enemy.
I 100% agree that innocent children should never be targeted OR PUT IN HARMS WAY say by putting a childrens day care center on the 2nd floor of a
valid military target as human shields!
When children are placed in harms way DELIBERATELTY they unfortunately become victims of collateral damage which is clearly acceptable to the USA's
TPTB and Military Industrial Corporate Conglomerate because ...
And using the piss-poor excuse that 'civilians' are killed overseas in wars doesn't fly.
Is a clear case of National Hypocracy!
Now remember what OL posted in reply to you...
I have one word for you to study for homework ok! HYPOCRACY!
There was no need to blow up that building and kill all those people. To believe it was necessary is paranoid and delusional .. and most
I agree as did McVeigh really achieve his primary mission objective???
The title and topic of this thread - McVeighs death certificate occupation listing - the occupation listed was wrong. It's just that simple.
Use some logic. If he was some super-secret-shadow-gov't stooge, then that super-secret-shadow-gov't wouldn't go and list it on his death
certificate. Use some common sense people ...
You obviously have never heard the military jargon terminology used such as "FUBAH" and "SNAFU" have you?
Was McVeigh doing some shadow gov't bidding? Maybe. Maybe not. But ask yourselves .. What would some super-secret-shadow-gov't want him to
blow up an FBI building for? What purpose?
To Cause Fear and Intimidation within CONUS and make it look like someone else was at fault!
And if he supposedly was on the other side ... an EX-Super-Secret-Shadow-Gov't stooge going back and sticking it to his former bosses ... do
you really think that FBI building was the HQ for it ?? Really? They'd really be working out of an FBI building with a day care and a bank etc etc ..
in the open ... for everyone to see??
Nothing better than hiding in plain sight if one can get away with it! Ask some assassins about that!
Or better yet ask your own government about black projects to do with stealth and invisibility etc.
Overlooking the obvious won't help your argument much!