Immediate Deployment Just Ordered, Merry Christmas

page: 3
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by quedup
 


In reference to the blog post and before it's news, those two sources are unreliable. Especially before it's news. I was not calling you a liar in that regard. I'm not trying to shoot the messenger.

As far as the OP is concerned.. Well that's a different story.




posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   
reply to post by quedup
 


RT news ? Where ? Well that's a horse of a different color. RT news rocks.
At any rate if this does pan out to be true. All bets are off and we are forced to look at things possibly becoming
Biblical. The winter solstice is on the approach.

And someone had a thread up last night about seven days from a blood red moon there would be war. So IDK what to think at this moment.
edit on 16-12-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


RT news puts out tripe.

They seem to print and put on video some of the worst of the most crummy conspiracy theories found on ATS and infowars.com.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This thread is a good example of that.

This member was astute enough to point out a very glaring detail that the research geniuses at RT seemed to have overlooked:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Enough said.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   
The only reason that Obama is pulling the troops out of Iraq and Afganistan is because Iran is next, and troops going home is good for his re-election chances. Thats why the US court just said that the Ayatollah was involved in 9/11..



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cambion
The only reason that Obama is pulling the troops out of Iraq and Afganistan is because Iran is next, and troops going home is good for his re-election chances. Thats why the US court just said that the Ayatollah was involved in 9/11..


What court?

And more importantly:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by drmeola
reply to post by mastahunta
 


NOT, when are people going to learn Republican/Demarcates all the same, at one time it was the same party. We need to stop looking at parties, and start waking up to the truth found in the law, just look at my threads on the law and how it effects all of us.

If your going to vote, and by the way voting itself is a crime, but if your going to participate then stop voting parties and vote for the person that has the same beliefs as yourself.

Besides the President is really nothing more then a figure head in my opinion, with the elitist pulling the strings, as in big bankers.


You got that right.Call them demopublicans and republicrats.They put on a good show publicly but behind closed doors their slapping backs and laughing at the gullible masses.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:18 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


Alright this is getting ri G-D diculous. I agree with everyone but not really.

I'll be damned if I'm going back to MSM and try to convince myself I just needed to come full circle.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
Reading the posts and thought
I should sign in here just in case
we get a credible source on
troops being deployed. Lots of
rumors such as this going around
lately - sooner or late one is going
to be right.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn

Originally posted by Cambion
The only reason that Obama is pulling the troops out of Iraq and Afganistan is because Iran is next, and troops going home is good for his re-election chances. Thats why the US court just said that the Ayatollah was involved in 9/11..


What court?

And more importantly:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Can't actually remember what court, but that doesn't actually matter. The american goverment is set on Iran and that is where it is going to unleash it's war machine next.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Why not try to more fully vet information?

If some news agency says the Supreme Court ruled on this or that. Why not try to look up the docket number of the case and get the details from the horses mouth instead of getting the spin from the guy in the news agency that "says" what is being "said" by the SCOTUS?

It's a matter of taking the extra mile. If people who post links don't bother to fully vet out what they are posting they can be certain they will be torn apart in a debate if they are irresponsible enough to have their opinion influenced by BS.

I think the individual can do better, and must. This is the internet age. The fact that people STILL wanna take things at face value and continue to be lazy about the sources of information they use is simply inexcusable. It would be laughable if it didn't create legions of gullible conspiracy theorists.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Cambion
 


Yes it does matter.

What court?

You wanna throw this stuff around like it's fact and you then turn around and say it doesn't matter.

That's garbage reasoning and you know it.
edit on 16-12-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:48 PM
link   
here's some help.

US Claims Iran 9/11 link


A US court has won a default judgement that Iranian officials, including its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, provided help to the 9/11 hijackers behind the worst terror attack on American soil. The lawsuit was filed by the families of the atrocity's victims. There was no Iranian representation in court. RT talks to Michel Chossudovsky, Director of the Center for Research on Globalization.





posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


Unless the OP is the anonymous person that posted the tweet about the same thing, I posted the screen shot on page one, then that's two people who were saying something about this.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   
www.chinadaily.com.cn...


Western diplomats believe a firm Security Council resolution backed by Russia, Syria's longstanding ally, could make a real difference to the crisis.


Still moving through the security council as of three hours ago.

However, Canada restated its warning for Canadians to get out of Syria immediately again today.

www.cbc.ca...


www.nowlebanon.com...


To be sure, Hof had unambiguous words on where the US stood regarding the Syrian regime and its assessment of its fate, dubbing it a “dead man walking.” But with the administration focused on the post-Assad phase and the fate of minorities, it has failed to put forth a convincing policy on the more urgent task of how to remove Assad before he does more damage.

In the end, however, as the Committee’s chairman, Rep. Chabot, told Hof, “ultimately [physical force] probably is going to be necessary.” The administration simply must come to terms with that and prepare accordingly.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


I have been looking for a while about which US court it was, all I seem to find is just snippets with no actual court name, so that isn't definative.
edit on 16-12-2011 by Cambion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 11:14 PM
link   
What, another "kinetic action"? AKA: an end run around the Constitution to make war on another country without approval? I guess there are more olive-complected people left to kill after all, Mr. President!

/TOA



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
If there were moves by US forces, they wouldn't be bloody advertizing it and announcing this. Those troops would be under orders to keep this silent, especially while nothing has been agreed at the UN yet and Russia is still discussing their stance.

Sometimes I wonder just how naive people here are.
And why people posting "I heard from a relative that..." are not banned when it's proven to be BS.

Nothing would surprise me these days, but if this is actually proven to be true I'll buy the OP a pint.



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 11:39 PM
link   


TextWhen a radical Islamic terrorist group evacuates an Arab country, that's a sign of a dangerous situation even the most bloodthirsty killers fear. According to sources in Israel, the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas began evacuating its Syrian external headquarters this week..


Operation Destroy Damascus perhaps????? An inside job, made to look like it was done by the US or Israel, to polarize the middle east?????

Just a thought.....




www.examiner.com...



posted on Dec, 16 2011 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by quedup
 


In reference to the blog post and before it's news, those two sources are unreliable. Especially before it's news. I was not calling you a liar in that regard. I'm not trying to shoot the messenger.

As far as the OP is concerned.. Well that's a different story.


Before its News Is a Messenger - it's up to you to source it back to original info.

You will only ever get Messengers believe me - then you use your own discrimination.



posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by randyvs
 


RT news puts out tripe.

They seem to print and put on video some of the worst of the most crummy conspiracy theories found on ATS and infowars.com.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This thread is a good example of that.

This member was astute enough to point out a very glaring detail that the research geniuses at RT seemed to have overlooked:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Enough said.


I think enough has been said on this! RT News is the closest you're going to get to the truth and as for putting out stuff from Info wars - it's the other way around mate.

You still don't say what you class as a reliable source - you'd have some great followers if you did!





top topics
 
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join