It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No one in the government is looking Iran's way either. This suit is not being filed by the government. If it had been easier to make a case against Saudi Arabia, the lawyers would have filed suit against Saudi Arabia. This is not a government law suit.
Other nations, such as Saudi Arabia and possibly Israel, are much more liable in the case of 9/11 but no one in the government will look their way.
What environment? Do you think this law suit started last week or last month? You mean we have always been friendly with Iran and now that it's changing it's time to spring this law suit? Or do you think we have always been friendly towards Iran and this lawsuit is the justification for a surprise war we want to start?
So considering the environment in which this is occuring, I think it is a valid response to be very critical of any action taken against Iran when it has become very clear that tptb wish to enter Iran at any moment.
No one in the government is looking Iran's way either. This suit is not being filed by the government. If it had been easier to make a case against Saudi Arabia, the lawyers would have filed suit against Saudi Arabia. This is not a government law suit.
What environment? Do you think this law suit started last week or last month? You mean we have always been friendly with Iran and now that it's changing it's time to spring this law suit? Or do you think we have always been friendly towards Iran and this lawsuit is the justification for a surprise war we want to start?
I think your antiicipated responses are the responses you feel are legitimate respnses anyway because you to can see the pattern of problem, reaction, solution by the US against any country they turn their attention to, which I might add, is well documented on this forum.
See, I haven't been able to bring myself to do that. I think I have a failure of imagination. I have to have at least a little evidence to believe in something, unless it's just a mental exercise.
"The judge is corrupt", "the timing is bad" and doubt in the witnesses are all reasons to doubt that Iran had anything to do with 9/11. There is no evidence to believe so, but it is well within the realm of possabilities. That is where the conspiracy-theorist in us all tend to takeover.
See, I haven't been able to bring myself to do that. I think I have a failure of imagination. I have to have at least a little evidence to believe in something, unless it's just a mental exercise.
My big fear is that a committee of ATSers will show up at my door, remind me that ATS is a conspiracy website, tell me I have no imagination, and tear up my membership card. Will you be one of the committee, or will you ask that I be given propation and re-education?
9/11 Lawsuit Reveals Iran's Direct Involvement in 9/11 Plot
NEW YORK, May 19, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Attorneys representing families of 9/11 victims today are informing a federal court in Manhattan that they are filing comprehensive evidence that Iran played a key role in planning and facilitating the 9/11 attacks and called on the U.S. Government to declassify documents detailing what the U.S. intelligence community knew about Iran's relationship to al Qaeda prior to September 11, 2001.
The 9/11 commission report said there was “strong evidence that Iran facilitated the transit of Al Qaeda members into and out of Afghanistan before 9/11, and that some of these were future 9/11 hijackers.” The report also said there was circumstantial evidence that senior Hezbollah operatives were closely tracking the travel of some of the hijackers into Iran in November 2000.
But the commission said that it had “found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack,” and that the “topic requires further investigation by the U.S. government.”
Thomas E. Mellon Jr., a lawyer for the families, said the suit, first brought in Washington in 2002 and later moved to Manhattan, sought to do that investigation.
Originally posted by charles1952
Does Obama pay any public attention to this case at all? ... My guess? He says it's a private civil lawsuit which he can not be appropriately involved in.
Second point. I'm having trouble seeing this as a government operation because 1) it's too elaborate, 2) the payoff, if any, is too remote, and 3) they don't gain anything that they don't already have. The world will not pay much attention to a US court judgment against Iran, so any gain would have to be domestic. Americans already dislike Iran, so what's his reward?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by John0Doe
I don't know how you forge people. The judge found there were witnesses to the planning that gave their testimony as well as other experts and an extensive record.
Besides, this isn't the United States v. Iran, it's families of victims v. Iran. Please explain why Obama might think it's necessary to intervene with massive forgery and extensive witness tampering into a civil lawsuit? To make Iran look bad to Americans? That is silly, in my opinion. Americans aren't in love with Iran anyway.
The best argument I can see, and which no one has used, is that since this is a civil lawsuit only a preponderance of the evidence is necessary, not "beyond a reasonable doubt."