It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“The extensive record submitted to this court, including fact witnesses and expert testimony, is satisfactory to this court,” Judge Daniels said. The court “accepts as true” the various allegations of the plaintiffs and their experts, he declared, and “will issue an order” in the coming days that Iran bears legal responsibility for providing “material support” to the 9/11 plotters and hijackers.
In presenting evidence gathered by the attorneys and their outside investigator, Timothy Fleming revealed tantalizing details of still-sealed videotaped depositions provided by three defectors from Iranian intelligence organizations.
One of those defectors was “physically present” when al-Qaida’s second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, came to Iran in May 2001 for four days of intense closed-door meetings with the top leadership in Iran to discuss the impending attacks.
Originally posted by charles1952
I see that there is a thread about Iranian involvement in 9/11 here on ATS. It's sole source is RT, even though it's a story available on more reliable sites. Not surprisingly, the reactions of posters on that thread show how their opinions were shaped by the RT story.
Here's a piece on The Daily Caller that has quotes, sources, and solid information instead of the innuendo of the RT piece.
Iran shares blame for 9/11
“The extensive record submitted to this court, including fact witnesses and expert testimony, is satisfactory to this court,” Judge Daniels said. The court “accepts as true” the various allegations of the plaintiffs and their experts, he declared, and “will issue an order” in the coming days that Iran bears legal responsibility for providing “material support” to the 9/11 plotters and hijackers.
In presenting evidence gathered by the attorneys and their outside investigator, Timothy Fleming revealed tantalizing details of still-sealed videotaped depositions provided by three defectors from Iranian intelligence organizations.
One of those defectors was “physically present” when al-Qaida’s second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, came to Iran in May 2001 for four days of intense closed-door meetings with the top leadership in Iran to discuss the impending attacks.
You'll notice that no one is suggesting that Iran was the only party involved. This doesn't end all 9/11 conspiracy theories, but it does affect some of them.
There's a lot more, let me suggest you look at the article.
What I expect to see in response, and forgive me for sounding bitter and cynical, is the following:
"It happened in an American courtroom, it can't be fair."
"The Iranians weren't present to defend themselves." I'll bet everybody from the NYFD to the CIA would have been glad to have the involved Iranians show up.
"The judge is a puppet. It's just an excuse for an American war." We need another excuse?
I just thought this story was very important, and the thread sourced to RT wasn't getting it out.
Originally posted by charles1952
And are we agreed that it is a legitimate lawsuit, filed by real people, and not a complete act staged by the CIA?
In presenting evidence gathered by the attorneys and their outside investigator, Timothy Fleming revealed tantalizing details of still-sealed videotaped depositions provided by three defectors from Iranian intelligence organizations.
Originally posted by charles1952
A "fair" point? Well, maybe, IF the Iranian representatives had not been allowed to be there. But I'm assuming you know enough law to do they had to be notified of the proceedings or the case wouldn't have gone forward for "failure of service."
Besides all that, what do you expect the Plaintiff's attorneys will do to collect money from Iran? Knock on their embassy door and hand them a piece of paper?