It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by steveknows
Yes but the U.S didn't place the Taliban in the firing line the Taliban did. They could have always told Bin ladin and he's mob to go but chose not to.
Anyway this is about terrorists attacking their host country and should they face capital punishment. It's not about discussing what the Taliban should and shouldn't have done.
If these people want to have a war with us that's fine but they should put in a uniform and be seen as prisoners of war or continue to hide among us and be shot as per the laws of war. 18 years isn't enough. They should die.
I remember Bush saying "your're with us or your against us" The Taliban chose to be against by choosing to harbour wanted terrorists. They put themselves in the firing line.
Also what people seem to avoid aknowledging is that by giving away the evidence that Taliban asked for they might very well have been giving away their intelligence sources.
The men should all "hang your heads in shame", she said, describing their level of operating as "amateurish" and the plan they were hatching as "far from sophisticated".
Read more: www.smh.com.au...
Fattal, Justice Betty King said, appeared to be the "most dogmatic" among them, acknowledging he was "simple man" with low intelligence and whose cognitive impairment would not have been helped at all by his participation for many years in the sport kickboxing, during which he suffered multiple concussions.
Read more: www.smh.com.au...
The men were connected to the Somali-based terrorist group al-Shabaab, and tried to obtain a fatwa, or religious decree, justifying the attack.
Read more: www.smh.com.au...
Originally posted by steveknows
bleeding hearts for these terrorists.
They hate you for who you are. They want you dead. They are happy to kill you and your children in their own country and feel like they've done the right thing by God.
They have no moral rules of war. They don't usually bomb a base and hope that civilians aren't in the firing line. They make a point of hitting soft targets and that is you and your family while you are shopping. They make a point of it. They hate you. If they can kill your child it means to them that your child won't grow up to produce more infidels.
You are thier enemy it makes no difference if you don't see it that way.
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by steveknows
Calling me a 'bleeding heart' for taking a different stance other than 'kill all the Muslims' is extremely insulting to me. It is a cop-out response designed to vilify me (and others) for having a different opinion.
I draw my opinions from years of having studied this very subject, listening to all points of view then coming to my own conclusions. Funnily enough, many well known and highly respected people also feel the same as I do.
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by steveknows
OK fine, and I have stated my reasons why I believe this particular case was just a bunch of disillusioned idiots who thought they could achieve martyrdom by walking into an army base and opening fire.
I see nobody as addressed the fact that they wouldn't have gotten very far in before being killed. The whole plan was going to fail dismally, not exactly something which I would expect 'terrorist masterminds' to come up with.
That and I am still pissed about the whole 'they should be executed' thing. Should we execute you for having bad thoughts about Muslim 'terrorists' and talking about killing them? Didn't think so. Besides, the plan never took place, you would be executing them for a 'thought crime'. That's very "Minority Report" if you ask me.
Originally posted by steveknows
What I'm saying is that these people see themsleves as soldiers. And under the rules of war if a soldier dresses like a civilian and in the country of the enemy then they are subject to those rules of war which is capital punishment.
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by steveknows
What I'm saying is that these people see themsleves as soldiers. And under the rules of war if a soldier dresses like a civilian and in the country of the enemy then they are subject to those rules of war which is capital punishment.
You said it yourself, they see THEMSELVES as soldiers. They tried to obtain a religious decree to justify their actions and were denied, meaning that the head 'terrorists' didn't consider the men good enough or the men to be 'terrorists'. Their own 'organisation' denied them for crying out loud.......if they saw themselves as soldiers then it was all in their own heads.
I don't believe anyone should be executed for anything, let alone a few men who had delusions of grandeur. 18 years jail time is more than enough punishment in my opinion.
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by steveknows
Capital Punishment is abhorrent and a throwback from the dark ages. It is nothing more than jazzed up barbarism that is upheld and practised by morally deprived people who, in my opinion, just like to see death without the threat of going to jail.
Doesn't matter what a person does, who they kill or rape or who they decide to attack, I abhor the use of execution in any way, shape or form and hold an extreme distaste for associating with people who agree with it's usage.
The Dark Ages are calling, they want their punishments and views back please.
Originally posted by steveknows
I'd prefer to back capital punishiment then to be a condonor of terrorists such as yourself fella.
All through this thread you've supported people form another country who wanted kill Australians. What a guy you are.
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by steveknows
I'd prefer to back capital punishiment then to be a condonor of terrorists such as yourself fella.
Please quote the post where I condone 'terrorists'. I'll bet you my left nut that you cannot.
"Yes, this thread is about 'terrorists' getting punished for attacking their countries but at the heart of it, who declared them terrorists in the first place, and why? Again, it always comes back to the US and a bunch of complete lies."
If that's not condoning thier actions what is?
But nice try at deflection, you don't like what I'm saying so now you try to paint me as a bad guy. Typical reaction from somebody who believes they are right and everyone else is wrong.
No I'm not at all and if you look through the post it is you who started on this train of being derogative to me simply because you and I had different views.
lets just agree to disagree eh?
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by steveknows
After having gone outside and had a few smokes, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps I was being a little harsh toward you mate. I have very strong feelings on these issues (as you might be able to tell) and, combined with having a bad day, I probably got a little too heated about the thread.
Anyways, in terms of that, sorry mate. Beers on me.edit on 17/12/2011 by Kryties because: (no reason given)