Strange Cosmic Ray (Neutron Monitor) data fluctuation.

Yes, the neutrino radiation supposed to decrease because is pushed away by the wind from our sun. This time the radiation is spiking , and as far as I understand this is above levels normally recorded at any period of the solar cycle. However, we could be on the wrong track, maybe someone tested a neutron bomb , a few hundred miles away from Moscow haha..

reply to post by Romanian


If Moscow were testing a Neutron bomb, they would allow it to show up on their own monitors, and allow public viewing on the net?

That's a tough sell.

reply to post by TrueAmerican


lol you never know. Maybe it is supposed to be seen! )

I tried to e-mail the principal investigator listed on the website, but the e-mail address does not exist..

Originally posted by Romanian
reply to post by TrueAmerican

 

lol you never know. Maybe it is supposed to be seen!

)

I tried to e-mail the principal investigator listed on the website, but the e-mail address does not exist..

edit on 16-12-2011 by Romanian because: (no reason given)

This thread is getting better and better!

Originally posted by Romanian
Yes, the neutrino radiation supposed to decrease because is pushed away by the wind from our sun.

This is not correct, and you have been confusing neutrinos with neutrons in many of your posts...please learn the difference. They are completely different. Nobody has shown any data on neutrinos in this thread yet you keep referring to them.

This time the radiation is spiking , and as far as I understand this is above levels normally recorded at any period of the solar cycle. However, we could be on the wrong track, maybe someone tested a neutron bomb , a few hundred miles away from Moscow haha..

Good you used neutron that time, that's what the graphs show.

In additions to variations in solar activity, and possible changes in cosmic intensity, another possibility is changes in the Earth's magnetic field as this article states:

Cosmic ray variations due to the Earth’s magnetic field

Fluctuations of neutron monitor count rates occur on various time scales and for various reasons. An observed fluctuation need not imply that the cosmic ray intensity itself changed. We illustrate this here with a recent observation, where a temporary enhancement was observed by some neutron monitors. The enhancement can be explained by the simultaneously observed variation of the Earth’s magnetic field, which for a few hours allows particles of lower energy than usual to penetrate.

The key to identifying this source of variation was to look at multiple neutron monitors at various latitudes, so if you're really curious, then look up some more neutron monitors at other latitudes and see what they show, then see if the earth's magnetic field might play a role as this article explains.

reply to post by Romanian


That is why scientist could measure particles faster than the speed of light....

I have no idea why I just blabbered that out.....

reply to post by Arbitrageur


Good to know , I was at least partially correct haha. Hopefully I will have some time to do some reading about it.

Interesting . My only guess would be the aftereffects from a very distant supernova. It will be interesting to see if this will be followed by other peaks shortly.

PS . Ok after reading Arbitrageur`s post I withdraw this guess lol.

Originally posted by Arbitrageur


Cosmic ray variations due to the Earth’s magnetic field

Fluctuations of neutron monitor count rates occur on various time scales and for various reasons. An observed fluctuation need not imply that the cosmic ray intensity itself changed. We illustrate this here with a recent observation, where a temporary enhancement was observed by some neutron monitors. The enhancement can be explained by the simultaneously observed variation of the Earth’s magnetic field, which for a few hours allows particles of lower energy than usual to penetrate.

The key to identifying this source of variation was to look at multiple neutron monitors at various latitudes, so if you're really curious, then look up some more neutron monitors at other latitudes and see what they show, then see if the earth's magnetic field might play a role as this article explains.

This one is interesting, more like a south Atlantic anomaly allowing more cosmic radiation in i guess. Just looking around other monitoring station, did not find the same pattern yet. Still going to watch out for tomorrows data Thanks for the neutrino-neutron explanation .

I'm not sure what that "%" represents but when you look at the raw data from the detector there doesn't seem to be anything unusual happening.
December
cr0.izmiran.rssi.ru...

reply to post by Phage


Well there does appear to be a steady rise in today's figures:



The digits display reflects this as well:
Link

Moscow cosmic ray station.
Uncorrected for pressure data.

YYYY.MM.DD hh:mm imp/min
*********************************************************
2011/12/16 00:00 9860
2011/12/16 01:00 9846
2011/12/16 02:00 9902
2011/12/16 03:00 9964
2011/12/16 04:00 9998
2011/12/16 05:00 10061
2011/12/16 06:00 10062
2011/12/16 07:00 10119
2011/12/16 08:00 10173
2011/12/16 09:00 10238
2011/12/16 10:00 10278
2011/12/16 11:00 10330
2011/12/16 12:00 10381
2011/12/16 13:00 10409
2011/12/16 14:00 10479
2011/12/16 15:00 10486
2011/12/16 16:00 10553
2011/12/16 17:00 10496
2011/12/16 18:00 10542
2011/12/16 19:00 10542
2011/12/16 20:00 10572
2011/12/16 21:00 0
2011/12/16 22:00 0
2011/12/16 23:00 0
*********************************************************

reply to post by TrueAmerican

That would seem to be a roughly diurnal effect but it was much higher on the 5th.

It looks like they have "corrected data" where the spikes are being reduced.

is it possible to find out the exact date and time this phenom started?

i do remember reading somewhere on here or there that the east coast earthquake (and denver, co earthquake) from a few months ago could have POSSIBLY been caused by neutron bombs detonated underground, in order to destroy a few malevolently inspired underground facilities.

just sayin...

reply to post by metalshredmetal

Just saying what?

The spike seen in one data representation began on the 15th of this month.
The data is for neutron radiation levels.
There is no such thing as a "neutrino bomb".

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by metalshredmetal

 

Just saying what?

The spike seen in one data representation began on the 15th of this month.
The data is for neutron radiation levels.
There is no such thing as a "neutrino bomb".

um, ...alright? i'll bow as i walk backward and exit the thread..

Originally posted by Phage
There is no such thing as a "neutrino bomb".

Just thinking about that, it would be perhaps the worlds most useless invention.
A bomb, who's effects are basically zero.

reply to post by alfa1

Who knows, terrorists could be setting hundreds of them off as we speak!

reply to post by Phage


And we would never know

This is just a false flag so the NWO can justify invading the sun.