It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by verschickter
How can my theory have flaws when I don't actually have a theory. I pointed out the obvious flaws in your first theory, and your second theory is even more flawed even though I was polite enough to entertain it for you.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
No attitude here, it's just I feel obligated to point out certain things such as outright lies. I also will point out any flaws that I may find. This is a discussion after all, right?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
If I present a flawed theory I invite you to shoot it down. Instead you have sunk to Chad's level and have decided to fabricate statements, an expampl of one of your fabricated statements is where you accused my theory to have flaws, when I actually haven't presented any actual theories other than to entertain another member's hypothetical theory.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Surely you would rather discuss the topic at hand rather than bicker over statements I never actually made. The two of you have turned this thread into a discussion of statements that were never made. I don't say this very often, but the two of you are trolling.
Originally posted by verschickter
reply to post by detachedindividual
First, he didnt mentoined western influence, that was the point. The other point is in my post above
Originally posted by Rapha
The Russians have been allies with Iran for years.
So this could be a bluff where the russians are saying to the west, 'do what you want with Iran. We will not help Iran again !!'. When in actual fact Russia is still Iran's ally.
False flag is possible. We will just have to wait and see. Lets see if China also cuts ties with Iran because of this event.
If I remember correctly, when Iran was in the process of trying to start the reactor, they had a deal with Russia
where Russia would supply the rods (if thats the right term, as I dont know what they are called before being used),
but the deal was Iran is supposed to return every rod afterwards to "ensure" there wasnt going to be malicious use
Originally posted by alwayssmile2
Wow. More war propaganda. Come on guys!
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Lose the attitude mate.
This is what you said:
I agree, a false flag must be considered. It's way too early for me to commit to any theory at this time. I won't lie, when it comes to this political arena, I can't help and consider false flag for any similar type of event.
So you agree that it must be considered, great, so how exactly will a false flag carried out by Russia against Iran work?
What motivation is there for Russia to turn on Iran?
Are you seeing the flaw in the theory yet?
edit on 16/12/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)
Who says it needed to be Russia performing a FF? It could be Israel or the USA.
Just because this happened in Russia does not mean that Russians planned a FF to ensnare Iran, it just means they found radioactive material on a passenger. That passenger could have been set up by any nation in order to justify an attack on Iran.
In fact, it seems to benefit Israel and the USA more than anyone else.
It could persuade Russia to switch sides, it would allow heated political debate in the USA knocking those who are against attacking Iran, it would allow Israel to scream "told you so!" while hiding their own stockpile of unregulated and unmonitored nukes. This could do a whole lot for Israel and the US.
It wouldn't be hard to set up considering. You find someone willing to sell, pay someone willing to be a mule, and make contact with someone on the ground at the airport to make sure the alert is released into the public domain before it goes through the Kremlin.
Not exactly rocket science.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
If anyone is in possession of stolen nuclear material and is seeking a buyer - what is the first country they would go to?.............................um would that be Iran!
If any nation was seeking to nuke the US - but didn't really fancy being nuked in return, what nation would be first choice to funell nukes to, so that it could act as a proxy?.......................I think that would be Iran as well, although NK comes a close second!
A second possibility is that a criminal organization wanted to test the efficiency of the Russian security apparatus. Rather than run the risk of losing valuable fissile material, they obtained the less well guarded Sodium 22 and shipped it in containers that they hoped would be sufficient to fool the security scanners. They were inadequate, so back to the drawing board.
NTI sponsored a “tabletop exercise” that simulated a crisis involving seizures of kilogram-quantities of weapons-usable nuclear material. Involving prominent Russian and US experts, this simulation demonstrated that there are significant but removable barriers to effectively and safely managing the crisis. These barriers are so serious that they could lead to significant delays in the two governments’ ability to act and ultimately could compromise successfully thwarting the detonation of a terrorist nuclear device.
The report--available in Russian and English--outlines the scenario, observations and findings and recommendations from the exercise. It also includes a paper addressing the legal basis for US-Russian cooperation in response to a nuclear smuggling incident.
Originally posted by patmac573
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
This is nothing ,if you take the time to read you will see that it is a calibration tool (sodium-22) do not do as the Mass Media and Blow it out of proportion