It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(CNSNews.com) -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that extending unemployment benefits would add “600,000 jobs to our economy.”
She also said that the money from unemployment benefits creates a “safety net” for the U.S. economy because it “injects demand into the economy -- creating jobs.”
“The payroll tax cut that the president proposed would put $1,500 in the pockets of 160 million Americans,” she said. “The unemployment insurance extension is not only good for individuals. It has a macroeconomic impact. As macroeconomic advisers have stated, it would make a difference of 600,000 jobs to our economy.”
Pelosi did not name those “macroeconomic advisers.” She continued: “Again this is important because this is about the safety net not just for these individuals, but for our economic system that, in times of unemployment, we have a safety net and that is important.”
Originally posted by xuenchen
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that extending unemployment benefits would add “600,000 jobs to our economy.”
“It is one of the most direct ways to infuse money directly into the economy because people who are unemployed and obviously aren’t running a paycheck are going to spend the money that they get. They’re not going to save it, they’re going to spend it. And with unemployment insurance, that way, the money goes directly back into the economy, dollar for dollar virtually.”
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Yeah it creates 600 000 jobs... in China.
Giving money to unemployed people means they can pay the big banks on their mortgages and buy stuff from China.
It's just more money sucked from the middle-class and sent abroad.
Originally posted by CREAM
What makes me the most angry is they throw around the number "600,000" NOT something that sounds like a non-made-up number, like: "around 500,000" (not that this will create any jobs, just saying). Not only that, but they state "600,000" like it's a fact, a sure thing, when it's obviously a contrived number.
The arrogance of politicians on both sides appalls me.
edit on 16-12-2011 by CREAM because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by xuenchen
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that extending unemployment benefits would add “600,000 jobs to our economy.”
She's not the only nutter who has said this recently.
Says Jay Carney, Barack Obama's White House Press Secretary...
“It is one of the most direct ways to infuse money directly into the economy because people who are unemployed and obviously aren’t running a paycheck are going to spend the money that they get. They’re not going to save it, they’re going to spend it. And with unemployment insurance, that way, the money goes directly back into the economy, dollar for dollar virtually.”
Jay Carney bashes WSJ reporter, claims unemployment checks create jobs
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Its clearly a Dem. line of thinkinbg.
edit on 16-12-2011 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Algernonsmouse
reply to post by xuenchen
Can I see your math, data, and facts please?
I wonder how this compares to all the jobs created by giving the same or more money to GE, etc went.
Any stats on that to compare with?
Originally posted by Algernonsmouse
reply to post by xuenchen
Can I see your math, data, and facts please?
I wonder how this compares to all the jobs created by giving the same or more money to GE, etc went.
Any stats on that to compare with?
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
600,000 jobs by paying people to not work? well i guess we have to extend the benefits to find out what it will do.
the only way i could see this as working is if they start to count people on unemployment as being employed.edit on 16-12-2011 by Bob Sholtz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
600,000 jobs by paying people to not work? well i guess we have to extend the benefits to find out what it will do.
the only way i could see this as working is if they start to count people on unemployment as being employed.edit on 16-12-2011 by Bob Sholtz because: (no reason given)
While we're at it, why don't we just make the whole country a welfare state, where everyone gets free money printed from the federal reserve? Then, we can just use our military-industrial-complex to force every other country to use the US dollar as their reserve currency. Like good ole' fashioned slavery and imperialism!
I kid, of course, but this is the direction both republicans and democrats are taking us in.
Originally posted by freetree64
Just imagine the job's created with an " Who wouldn't sleep with Nancy Pelosi campaign"?
We hire all participants, on the basis that they will agree to never sleep with Nancy, under any circumstances, and pay them all the standard minimum SF wage of $10.24 hr......
I feel we would have a number that would dwarf the current one proposed by the Former Squeaker of The House.....