It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by longtermproject
you don't honestly think we would let anything of important technical capabilities get into the wrong hands do you? Haha the RQ-170 was old tech.... sure it was new to the Civilian sector, but it was old news for the military.... It used 98% off the shelf parts..... what wasn't off the shelf, had to be made due to the shape, size and mission of the RQ-170.... It was a recon UAV... this on the other hand, is the harbinger of death
Originally posted by longtermproject
you don't honestly think we would let anything of important technical capabilities get into the wrong hands do you? Haha the RQ-170 was old tech.... sure it was new to the Civilian sector, but it was old news for the military.... It used 98% off the shelf parts..... what wasn't off the shelf, had to be made due to the shape, size and mission of the RQ-170.... It was a recon UAV... this on the other hand, is the harbinger of death
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by longtermproject
Just like we lost the U2, just like we lost the stealth help in Pakistan, just like we lost the f117 in Bosnia? Are you saying that the USA never loses advanced stuff? The f117 at the time was the top stealth aircraft in operation and we still lost it, this drone was better than the predator and yet we still lost it
Where is your evidence that this was 98% off the shelf parts; do you have a inventory and parts list we would certainly like to see. If it was so mundane why us Obama crying and begging for it back. I want to see this off the shelf parts list that you claim; if you can't produce ur you are speaking out of your bottom.
Originally posted by TheGreatest
OT: Pretty cool drone, they seem to get bigger and bigger. It kind of reminds me of the supposed blimp drone that's in development.