Judge Napolitano: We are now under martial law. Everyone in this country is now a potential terroris, page 9


Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 89 times


reply posted on 18-12-2011 @ 01:40 PM by jonnywhite
reply to post by ReadyPower


You do realize we're in a war time situation RIGHT NOW.

We've been at war since 2001-03.



reply posted on 22-12-2011 @ 06:09 PM by moniker
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
We americans have a say in the sence that we elect the people who made the legal structure in question, but typically we have to vote for candidates selected and financially maintained by the system. Who knows how a candidate appears on a ballot? Something to do with the system liking him or her.


Another set of questions from another "alien" (which, only in America, apparently can mean both an extraterrestrial and a non-American, which apparently are considered being one and the same):

1. As for voting in the US, I understand that you first have to register as agreeing with a certain party in order to be allowed to vote for it. So what is then the point of actually voting? Using an extract from that party affiliation database should be enough.

2. I also understand that the citizens do not actually vote directly for a candidate, but that their vote is simply being used to give an indication for who the real voters should vote. My understanding is that those voters (whoever they are) are being called "the electors", and that they could potentially vote totally different from what the ordinary citizens indicated in their votes.

3. My understanding is also that there are only 2 parties to choose from. Although being 100% more than in North Korea, that is still not a very wide selection of party agendas to choose from.

I might be totally wrong about this, but in either case... please enlighten me.


reply posted on 22-12-2011 @ 11:14 PM by Observor
reply to post by moniker


I am not an American, but lived there for a few years and consider myself to be reasonably familiar with their political system, so venture to answer your questions.
1. As for voting in the US, I understand that you first have to register as agreeing with a certain party in order to be allowed to vote for it. So what is then the point of actually voting? Using an extract from that party affiliation database should be enough.

False. You need not be registered with any party to vote for a candidate of that party. However, they have a system called 'primaries' to select the candidate, from among those wishing to, that will represent a party. In order to be able to vote in a primary, you must be registered with the state election commission as a member of that party. Even this is not a requirement in many states.
2. I also understand that the citizens do not actually vote directly for a candidate, but that their vote is simply being used to give an indication for who the real voters should vote. My understanding is that those voters (whoever they are) are being called "the electors", and that they could potentially vote totally different from what the ordinary citizens indicated in their votes.

I think you are referring to the election of the President. Yes, contrary to popular belief, the US President is not directly elected by the people, but by an electoral college. The memebrs of the electoral college are nominated by the states. The convention, not law, in most states is to let the people for a Presidential candidate and the one polling the most votes in the state gets to nominate all the electors from the state. There is one state which in 2004 decided to distribute the electors according the percentage vote received, but I am not sure if that is in effect yet. Since the electors are nominated by the candidate winning the popular vote in that state, it is extremely unlikely, although not impossible, that they will vote for a different candidate in the electoral college.
3. My understanding is also that there are only 2 parties to choose from. Although being 100% more than in North Korea, that is still not a very wide selection of party agendas to choose from.

Your understanding is completely wrong. There are more than a dozen registered political parties in the US and there is no limit on what the number can be. But historically the two parties Republican and Democratic have dominated the political dialogue and all but these two garner insignificant percentage of vote.


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 11:58 PM by Semicollegiate
reply to post by moniker



That is all true, but if the selection proccess started at the local level say at the size of a school district, the parties could die a natural death and the candidates could be truely representative of the populace. The system could work alot better than it does.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags