It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neotech1neothink
reply to post by steveknows
Are you joking? I'd hate to offend you if you're only joking. Just because it's getting a piggy back doesn't mean it can't take off on its own.
TWAS a JOKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
edit on 14-12-2011 by neotech1neothink because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OpusMarkII
I say drone with a protective tarpedit on 14-12-2011 by OpusMarkII because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lessthanunique
reply to post by NISMOALTI
Not sure where you're at but as I posted earlier, a friend at the Cherokee, Ks sheriffs department had to guard this thing as it was held up on its way into Missouri. The Northrop guy said it was an X47B. I have another picture of it that he text me but I don't know how to put it on here.
Originally posted by moderatej
reply to post by anon112358
Wow, I don't understand why it couldn't be transported by a aircraft carrier. To whoever said there was minimal security should read a little further, apparently the security was very tight around the craft. I wonder what would happen if someone just started following it to find its final destination.... Very interested to find out what this is. But I highly think if it was flight-capable, they wouldn't be transporting it on a semi-truck....... Northrop Grumman is saying they are already flying the X-45, so I don't think that is it. As for a movie prop... yeah right.