It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And alarming figures suggested Greece is potentially in the grip of a run on its banks, with around 20 per cent of deposits withdrawn since the start of the year. Anger: Belgian MEP Guy Verhofstadt refused to speak English to deliver his speech Anger: Belgian MEP Guy Verhofstadt refused to speak English to deliver his speech Amid bitter recriminations in Brussels over David Cameron’s decision to veto last week’s attempt at a new EU-wide treaty, senior figures said they would now try to strip Britain of its annual EU rebate in an act of vengeance. The rebate – which has reduced the size of the UK’s contribution to the EU budget over the past 25 years by billions of pounds – including £2.7billion this year, was won by Margaret Thatcher but is up for renegotiation soon. Former Belgian prime minister and Liberal MEP Guy Verhofstadt refused to speak English to deliver his speech on the summit, saying: ‘I shall speak my native language today because I don’t think English is a very appropriate language to use.’ He added: ‘When you are invited to a table, it is either as a guest or you are part of the menu. That can happen. ‘This selfish British strategy of protecting the City is one we cannot tolerate any longer.’
Joseph Daul, leader of the largest party in the European Parliament, the centre-right European People’s Party – from which the Prime Minister withdrew his Tory MEPs on coming into office – said Mr Cameron had acted with no consideration for EU solidarity. He told MEPs: ‘I believe the British rebate should be put into question.
‘Our taxpayers’ money should be used for things other than rewarding selfish and nationalistic attitudes.’
Hahahahaha your all in the same boat mate, it doesnt matter what britain or the other countires in the EU do.
Well guess what surrender monkeys, you are playing into the British publics hands by turning on your anti Britain rhetoric that just smaks of petulisim. The majority of us Brits don't want to be part of your unelected gang of dictators that is called the European union and you are providing us with the ammunition needed to get our government to tear up the lisbon treaty and remove ourselves from the money hole that is mainland europe. Britain is big enough to stand on its own two feet and we have something to say to you, good riddence.
Its well known that the queen actually owns much of the land in Britain. Political power doesnt come down to position or what paper say because money dictates power in our society and the royal family is extremley wealthy in gold and important assets.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by ThrowCatsAtCacti
Seriously, I guess you are American but I don't get why you guys think our Royal Family has any kind of political power or power over its people. They Royal Family is purely symbolic and if they tried to be anything more than that they would be disolved. Our nation is democratic and the power is held by the elected members of the house of commons.
As for your comments about the economics, your probably right. However at least we will still hold the power to decide how to rectify the problems ourself.
Originally posted by michael1983l
.... I don't get why you guys think our Royal Family has any kind of political power or power over its people. They Royal Family is purely symbolic and if they tried to be anything more than that they would be disolved. Our nation is democratic and the power is held by the elected members of the house of commons.
the monarch holds real power under the British constitution. Through the ‘royal prerogative’ he or she has the power to appoint Prime Ministers, dismiss governments, dissolve Parliament, and withhold assent to any legislation.The monarch also possess the power to recognise foreign states, issue declarations of war and peace, annex territory and form international treaties. He or she can also grant honours, issue pardons and appoint bishops and archbishops.SOURCE
Technically, most of these powers are exercised only on the advice of ministers, and quite a few have lain unused for many years. Nevertheless, they exist. It was through these powers that in 1975 the Australian governor general John Kerr, not an elected official but the Queen’s representative imposed upon Australia, dismissed the democratically elected Labor government of Gough Whitlam and appointed opposition leader Malcolm Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister, thereby launching a constitutional crisis. SOURCE
The real impact of the royal prerogative, however, is is not so much to empower the monarch as to allow the executive to bypass parliamentary scrutiny. Through royal prerogative powers, the government is able to declare war, make treaties, conduct diplomacy, govern Britain’s overseas territories and appoint and remove ministers, all without parliamentary approval. In 2003, on the very eve of the Iraq war, and well after it was clear that Britain and America were going to attack Iraq anyway, Parliament debated the issue and approved the attack. But even had it not approved of the action, it could not legally have prevented it – the royal prerogative would have allowed Tony Blair to commit to war without parliamentary approval. It was those powers that allowed David Cameron to attack Libya this month without first consulting parliament. The ability of the executive to bypass Parliament in this fashion is not only deeply undemocratic, it also serves to deepen the sense of the futility of politics. SOURCE
Britain is big enough to stand on its own two feet and we have something to say to you, good riddence
Originally posted by ThrowCatsAtCacti
]Its well known that the queen actually owns much of the land in Britain.