What's going on in Copernicus crater?, page 30
Pages: <<  27    28    29    30  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 01:07 PM by wmd_2008
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to
post by arianna



You have mentioned many times in this thread that you "know what to look for"

You say "you know" because

The recogntion process as far as the Mars and lunar images are concerned is self-taught over many years


Then you say scientists don't know what to look for.

They learn as they go along just like I have learnt from viewing and examining the images.


Yet the scientists use facts, and critical thinking to aid their search along with many precision instruments.

You use your eyes and imagination, no?



Well looking at what arianna has posted so far eyes 1% imagination 99% would be a fair split!


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 09:57 AM by wmd_2008
reply to post by arianna



You have handed nothing on a plate but your delusions of what you think you see in your butchered images nothing more nothing less, drawing circles round 50 + shadows on a picture proves nothing,

Claiming a 15mtr wide rock is not a rock but a structure when everyone else can see its a rock, claiming indentations caused by rolling rocks are not when to everyone else its clear what they are shows more about YOU than the claims you make for the images!


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 10:00 AM by DJW001
reply to post by arianna



Anyway, let's see what images NASA posts after Curiosity lands on Mars. I hope they will provide material that will prove me correct. If that happens will you still try and debunk what I post?


There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the images from Curiosity will leave you convinced that you've been vindicated. The rest of us will continue to see rocks.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 10:39 AM by Chamberf=6
reply to post by arianna





coupled with undeniable photographic evidence


Funny how that "evidence" is only found to be "undeniable" by you.



it would appear that the debunkers couldn't be bothered..

Oh, the "debunkers" (everyone but you in this thread it seems) can be bothered--IF there was credible evidence presented. Hell if anything besides photos of mundane rocks were given.

How can what you do be called "research"? All you do is manipulate and look at images.

You don't take into account any scientific information on the moon or Mars.

Research would mean being open to peer review, multiple points of view---more than looking at manipulated photos.



reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 10:48 AM by Chamberf=6
reply to post by draknoir2



So what exactly qualifies a thread for The Gray Area or ATS Skunk Works?


In my opinion this thread should be in Skunk Works.

That or Jokes, Pranks, and Puns.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 04:10 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by arianna



Oh, brother.....!:

I have had a very favourable reply from the scientist I contacted .....

(skip)

I am not going to reveal what the scientist has written only to say that agrees with me....



"...not going to reveal...."?


Well, you just did....the above speaks volumes......



reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 05:33 PM by Chamberf=6
reply to post by arianna





Conduit ends........


Easier to walk away than admitting you're wrong I suppose.
Pages: <<  27    28    29    30  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 3 days ago with 57 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 11 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 17 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 11 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags