Here is the problem we encounter with the 1960s onward Communists. Because of the radical changes that took place in, and reshaped, the Communist
movement many can pass themselves off as Neoliberals even without having to advocate the Stalinist economic program. Actually these are the
anti-Stalin Communist radicals who came about during the 1960s counterculture movement known today as the ‘New Left’. Its founding father was
Herbert Marcuse and the entire New Left was spawned in major part from his ‘Eros and Civilization’ which spread faster than ‘Das Kapital’
because it was easier for the average student to consume.
These are not Stalin Communists like most are trained to think, they are inspired in large part by Lenin and Trotsky. Hell, even the Neoconservative
movement has its intellectual roots traced back to 1930s Trotskyites. But the fact is these were anti-authoritarian Communists who devoted much of
their time to studies in Sociology, Psychology, and the later ethnic studies. These three groups were hugely influenced by the works of the Cultural
Marxists or, Freudian Marxists, who organized within the Institute for Social Research (i.e. Frankfurt School).
They were stumped that Marx’s predictions did not come true during WWI when the proletariat fought for their nation rather than link arms with all
the proletariat globally. When Russia became the first authentic Marxist country it should have caused revolutions in every other Western nation, but
that did not happen. So several Jewish Marxists got together to find out why, after several years of research they formed the conclusion that the
proletariat will not rise up because of the culture.
Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany shortly after they made their findings and kicked them out of Germany where they came to the United States. It
was here that they concluded Americans shared the same personality traits that allowed for Fascism to rise in Germany; this was called the
‘Authoritarian Personality’. This they concluded was developed from an upbringing in the bourgeois patriarchal family or, nuclear family, where
the acceptance of authority was established by the father figure. Because of this the workers would not rebel against their employers and thus the
proletariat revolution would never develop among the Western workers because of their culture.
Gyorgy Lukacs helped draft these ideas after he first implemented them in Socialist Hungary before the Rumanian Army invaded to overthrow the regime;
where the citizens did not fight back. They despised the Socialist government mostly because of what Lukacs did in education; he began teaching sexual
promiscuity, free love, and contraception to the Hungarian youth which was entirely contrary to established ethics in the society.
With these ideas the Frankfurt School developed Critical Theory which simplified means simply ‘to criticize’. By this they would teach criticism
of the entire Western society and its institutions, civil and sacred. Under Roosevelt and Truman two men from the FS were allowed into the army to
test their psychological ideas on the Allied occupied Germany. This was a form of re-education of the population based upon their designed techniques
which after being tested there were brought back to the United States then spread throughout Western Europe.
Another major contributor to their implementation was Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci who came up with the ‘long march through the
institutions’, which was a form of thought already circulating throughout Leninist-Trotskyite circles in Europe and North America. The new era of
Communists implemented this by infiltration of critical institutions of Western society; education, media, civil government, military, think tanks,
etc… and slowly implemented their ideas in those key areas so as to best influence society.
Well since they abandoned the idea of a working-class proletariat revolution they began to consider alternative. From this they decided that the
nuclear family must be deconstructed, that was the most important, then came their new proletariat. This would be made up of rebellious youth
(encouraged by sexual promiscuity, atheism, and new age), non-integrated minorities such as racial, religious, sexual, and ethnic, and the importing
of mass immigration from third world countries to undermine native wages (causing labor agitation) and tension. From this complete disunity of society
they, along with the natural consequences of disunity, tear down the bourgeois economic order causing mass tension and chaos leading the masses into
How did they get away with it? They developed their own form of speech control (every totalitarian state/society must have one) where if you say/write
something deemed offensive to the (un)official dogma then you could be reprimanded through censor, loss of employment, social persecution, name added
to a list (i.e. UK), and/or arrested for speech violations. All of this would run under the guise of anti-Fascism, which we saw arise largely during
the 1960s with the demonization of all Traditionalist Conservatism and Nationalism as akin to Nazism. We today call this speech/thought control,
warned of by George Orwell, ‘Political Correctness’.
So… is Obama a Communist? Probably, but not the kind they want you to think. By saying, he is a Communist they return; how is that, what economic
policy has he implemented that is Communist? They can shut you up that way because it is true, he has done no economic policy that is Communist but
you are never taught about Cultural Marxism, so how can you argue back? Obama is a Cultural Marxist, just as everyone who has been influenced or is
part of the New Left. This was the rise of the culture wars because it is a cultural ideology invented to tear down Western culture to cause mass
chaos then herd the masses into Marxism.
edit on 12/13/2011 by Misoir because: (no reason given)