posted on Dec, 20 2011 @ 06:00 PM
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by JohnJasper
Seriously, are you all denying that millions of deaths have been avoided because of the various successful vaccines that have come along in the past
I'm certainly denying it. To believe it's true is to ignore all evidence except that provided by the industry which both profits from and rests its
reputation on vaccination. The CDC itself admits that the major contribution to the demise of the major diseases was mostly down to improved
sanitation and hygiene. Unfortunately, they're not able or willing to recognise the disaster that vaccines visited upon populations repeatedly over
the centuries. Even as they do admit faults at one juncture or another, they always insist that the new, improved vaccines are above reproach and of
course, we should put our full faith in them. Hogwash is what I say (but only because we're on such a genteel forum!)
You have no evidence of your claims besides the ramblings of conspiracy theorists and pseudo-scientists. Do you honestly go around believing
everything you read on the internet except peer-reviewed medical studies?
Vacuous argument at best. I don't trust anyone who thinks that "conspiracy theorist" is a degrading term - they're either self-deluded, dishonest
or just dimwitted (to be kind!) I'm increasingly of the opinion that pseudo-scientist means any scientist that doesn't agree with approved
"science." I've previously expressed my opinion on the peer-review process but you're welcome to them.
I bet that you were all vaccinated against the various diseases when you were babies. How do you feel? Do you think you would feel better with
polio, or smallpox, or measles? Please, get serious.
I was also baptised as an infant. As superstitious mumbo-jumbo goes, baptism is certainly the least harmful - vaccination probably one of the more
dangerous. As vaccination doesn't ensure that you won't get these diseases (if you think it does then you're lost in the hype,) how I feel about
not getting them is irrelevant to the discussion.
As for your links:
Dr. Suzanne Humphries is a homeopathic doctor and is called a quack by more reputable doctors. The second one a bunch of links to Prison Planet. And
the third link is blocked by my antivirus as a malicious site.
As for your ad hominem attacks, of course your "reputable" doctors will call her a quack. She's (rightly) attacking their bread and butter and
they cannot rely on their results to defeat her. Yes, Prison Planet is a highly suspect site but air time is air time. And finally, you should have a
chat with your antivirus as there's nothing malicious about the harpub.co.cc website.
Originally posted by TheComte
Here is something to read for those of you who wish to read "the other side of the story." It has the benefit of being from what I feel is a
reputable and credible source. Now some of you may not feel that the CDC is as credible as Prison Planet or whale.to, and that's fine. Everyone is
entitled to their own opinion.
Thanks but the CDC is hardly an independent source. After the CDC's leading role in hyping up the "Swine Flu pandemic," not many are likely to
consider them credible.
You're obviously convinced that vaccination is all that the industry claims it to be and are welcome to your opinion. Unfortunately, the industry
uses its clout to bully populations into receiving unsafe and IMO useless vaccines completely disregarding the immediate and longterm affects on
health. Combined with the superstitious, fear-mongering belief that unvaccinated people are a threat to the rest of the population, this leads to an
ever-growing threat against those who, like me, do not want to be drugged, medicated, or vaccinated against my will.