It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 1946, Soviet school children presented a two foot wooden replica of the Great Seal of the United States to Ambassador Averell Harriman.
The Ambassador hung the seal in his office in Spaso House (Ambassador's residence).
During George F. Kennan's ambassadorship in 1952, a secret technical surveillance countermeasures (TSCM) inspection discovered that the seal contained a microphone and a resonant cavity which could be stimulated from an outside radio signal.
Originally posted by chrismicha77
So they reverse engineer this dronel God help us! It won't be long before we has Iranian drones flying in our country but lucky for us, they won't make it far without getting blown to smitherings. But other countries won't be that lucky and they will take advantage of it.Anyone else this could led to the bombing of Iran?
news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 12-12-2011 by chrismicha77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by On the level
Agree with one of the posters, the fact this hasnt been bricked or self destructed makes me smell a rat.
The most likely scenario is that Iran just jammed communications, I doubt they took control. Those drones have a relatively soft landing by design if the engine fails or something.
Originally posted by kobewan69
it's not about the drone it's about the communications. Military drones use a type of encrypted sattelite communications, that's how they are being controlled. The question is did they manage to intercept and hijack the communications to the drone thus making it land safely or did the US deliberatly give control to the drone. Both cases stand.
Originally posted by On the level
Agree with one of the posters, the fact this hasnt been bricked or self destructed makes me smell a rat. If a phone company can brick an iphone they surely America can stop a drone from being accessed. Think this is a ploy to let them develop the tech and we can just watch what they are up to.
Originally posted by Truth4Thought
reply to post by chrismicha77
Do you advocate the bombing of Iran?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
]The most likely scenario is that Iran just jammed communications, I doubt they took control. Those drones have a relatively soft landing by design if the engine fails or something.
And to the people talking about weapons, this drone didn't have any.
The biggest question is, did the thermite charges properly ignite and destroy the sensitive electronics? As long as that happened, the loss was somewhat expected. They didn't put the most advanced technology in this drone for that reason, because a loss was expected eventually, read the wiki on the RQ-170.