It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


On American Soil ?

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:03 AM

Originally posted by princeofpeace
And said EMP would cause the US to launch its second strike capability so AGAIN, who is coming here to play??? LOLOL.


The nuke would be launched from american soil. Preferably midwest. They wouldn't even have time to BREIF the president on the problem before it detonated. Since such a mission would have to be extremely covert to pull this off, America wouldn't have any idea who to launch missles at. Plus washington would likely be dust before they could even reboot their computers. (the EMP will knock out the power if nothing else).

Im not saying it would be easy, but it is very possible.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:07 AM
reply to post by JohnJasper

I agree with all of that. Our politicians are so much like the Wizard of Oz its not funny.

Text The USA is winning WW3 because they are defeating every independent nation one nation at a time (or several at once.) No country is being allowed to get anywhere near powerful enough to actually be a threat to our superiority. The countries that cannot be coerced into being friendly are instead kept disrupted politically, economically or militarily.

And yeah,for sure. I think it is more likely China will step things up through proxy rather than openly. And I think they are biding their time. But they will need to do something as the US are close to controlling the Middle East and are looking more at Africa. China will know it cant leave things too late. The trillions America owes is peanuts compared to controling the Reserve Currency.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:10 AM

Originally posted by Cobbed
The USA cannot be successfully invaded by foreign troops because it's surrounded by the biggest Oceans on two sides. Canada and Mexico cannot be used to amass a land army in secret.

Mexico can be used to amass mercenary terrorists.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:22 AM
Alot of use here took part in the other two world wars in past lives and had to die a thousand miles away from home fighting someone we never met because of "orders" Well at least the next wont be so far away and everyone will be fighting in our backyards for our backyards.

I almost feel bad for the poor dumb bastards that have to die for their country if they do invade.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:33 AM
reply to post by StratosFear

If you're right, how do you know you or any of us weren't on the "other side" of the last two world wars?

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:43 AM
reply to post by Azekual

Well that hardly matters now dont you think? The whole good guy bad guy thing doesnt really apply in war, your side fights the other side because those are the orders given. A good soldier doesnt question orders regardless of personal feelings. But if we are fighting to defend our homes that gives it a certain logic to it rather than get on a ship/plane and go mess up someone else`s home because of orders.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 07:53 AM
reply to post by StratosFear

I never applied a positive or negative connotation to my question. In fact, I put "other side" in quotation marks just to avoid that.
I asked because you assumed that you (or perhaps you knew you) and everyone here was on the side of the Allies during the first two world wars. The philosopher in me wants to know if you honestly know or if you were just biased to the allies since that is the life you (currently?) live.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 08:21 AM

Originally posted by tvtexan
reply to post by rebellender

So this is not a movie?
Thank you for clearing that up.
I almost thought that I was inside some alternate reality... where up was down and stupid was smart!

You may think that your 50 years on this planet guaruntees you some type of respect, and normally that's true. Then you opened your mouth.

I do not advocate war, especially if it might be in my own backyard. I just know that after 12 years in Texas, there are many here that are fully prepared for whatever might happen. No Movie, no plot line, just a bunch of bad-asses that take freedom and firearms very seriously.

There will be no ground war in Texas. It is Impossible.

I'm 43 by the way... maybe you could give me some advice on ED meds, is there a forum for that?

edit on 11-12-2011 by tvtexan because: (no reason given)

I wont respond to your personal comments for due reason. The US soldier has not been against a well trained , well disciplined, enemy since the NVA...Our civilian population hasn't seen battle since the Civil war. Sorry, Cowboys and Indians don't count.
Chinese PLA Army ::::: watch this one
its in Chinese but turn down the volume and watch...If those guys came to town?..... I am sure of your pride in your state and your untrained civil force armed only with bullets and pride wont go far against these guys in this video...PRIDE aside, Hope dont float!!!

Have you ever seen a buddy just disappear ? Train for that one while you sit and finger the action of your pistol......yeah, reality is a whole different world all together

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 08:46 AM
The only way a foreign army attacks on American soil is an EMP is set off over America first. Until then it will never happen.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:09 AM
reply to post by Abney

Not exactly. Although I made the EMP point myself, it isn't the only way. It is by far the most effective though.
You could go the black ops or MW3 route and unleash a coordinated strike against every major target (ny, la, washington, etc) using explosives or a toxic gas. Though it would be more difficult to get your people near the president, it isn't impossible.

I would recommend, if one was going this route, to pair this up with the EMP and nuke offensive I described earlier, which ever they use is up to them both have pros and cons. However it would have to be unleashed after the EMP. Doing it before might tip off their people to watch the radar more closely, which ruins the EMP surprise.

Honestly, taking over the U.S. just takes planning, conventional warfare isn't going to get us.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:11 AM
reply to post by TheRedneck
Thanx redneck

I did not know stuxnet was targeted at "PLC's"( programmable logic controllers)
That would do it. Change process values;shutdown ovens;bypass "safetys". You could really tear a facility up and hurt people with that kind of attack. Think it or a disguised cousin is lurking in a file on a wayward runaway drone somewhere? reminds me of "independence day" when will smith and Richard Benjimin make a "special delivery" to the alien mothership "mainframe"..

edit on 12-12-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-12-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:12 AM
reply to post by lleiffermawr

Merry Meet I think you are more on target than most posting. We are in the early stages of CW2 no doubt; the great dividing line will not be sectional like CW1 but will be ideological that threaten every fabric of this country; whether we are to remain Republic or become a Socialist State is the real question; we cannot travel backwards, but we need to seriously think about killing part of the beast (federal govt machine).
edit on 12-12-2011 by beachbumfun because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:40 AM

Originally posted by havok
reply to post by elevatedone

We don't have enough military support here in the US, I agree.

But, per Constitutional rights, the Governor of each state can enact several militias...
In essence, inviting all the "armed-to-the-teeth" rednecks and hilljacks (like myself) to defend the country.
Therefore, giving the US a considerable amount of firepower from behind the blades of grass.
Which I can guarantee would happen, if said war took place on our soil.

edit on 11-12-2011 by havok because: spelling....don't ban me elevatedone....LOL

Being a good hunter doesn't make you a good soldier.

A trained platoon would probably chew up and spit out a small "redneck" town.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:42 AM
Assuming a pre-invasion "non-aggression treaty" was signed with Canada beforehand (perhaps with Alaska being offered for cooperation), a west coast attack by the Chinese in coordination with a Mexican invasion from the south and a Russian attack on 2 east coast fronts (one north and one south launched from Cuba), the U.S. would be done in a matter of weeks.

And the world would cheer...

By the way, if this did occur, Russia and China would either sign a treaty with Israel OR give the Arab nations permission to invade/destroy...

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 09:43 AM

Originally posted by samlf3rd
We are too smart, and too gangsta. Their armies would have one heck of a time getting through Gary, IN. I remember as a kid if we ever had to drive through Gary we would lock the doors (still do) drive slowly through red lights, etc. You got Cali, crazy people in the sticks, they better not send ground troops. I know how to crete an electric fence from a computer monitor, just so you know.

That last thing I said about being a good hunter not making you a good soldier, goes double for people who describe themselves as "Gangsta".

A war on U.S. soil wouldn't be amateur hour, which is the only place people who call themselves "gangsta" need to be. If they manage to land troops in the U.S., it would mean they have a very strong military capability. Which means their ground troops would be likely well trained. Not the kind of folks you go "bustin' caps" at.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 10:17 AM
We are delusional if we think it can’t be done.

Day one early AM EST: We get softened up by strategic terrorist style strike teams as insurgents use the waterways coming up the Mississippi, Ohio and Chattahoochee rivers. These attacks focus on damns, bridges and power generation facilities and effectively cut of east west travel, supply lines and put everything east of the Mississippi back into the stone age due to no power.

Day One early AM EST: Mass insurgents bum rush the eastern and western border crossing and start attacking small towns as a diversion. The diversion covers the transport of nuclear weapons or massive thermobaric weapons into the US.

Day one noon EST: Detonate WMDs in San Diego, Houston, Dallas and Phoenix setting up large scale casualties and complete disruption of all US transportation and commerce. Martial law declared. All air and ground traffic halted. Military patrols all interstates and skies

Day one 4PM EST: additional WMDs make it to additional west coast and Midwest targets despite roadblocks by military.

Day two early AM: Submarine missile bombardment of strategic targets on west and east coast. Subs are sunk by US Navy but damage is done. US threaten all out nuclear war against anyone found complicit in the attacks but a target is as yet unknown / unclear.

Day two noon: All out nuclear Armageddon.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 10:29 AM
reply to post by beanandginger

Assuming your method isn't a coalition of all the nations that hate us, the equipment they use in the fight, specifically the submarines, would be traceable back to their home country. However I do like the idea, and I suggest a couple modifications. Have the WMD's in place before you infiltrate the waterways. It will make things go faster. Also, make DC one of the targets for the WMD. If you manage to take out Washington, you have completely crippled the military and the nation. The military would falter and the states would ultimately be on their own.
Taking out washington also neuter the U.S. as a nuclear power since the everyone who knew the launch codes for the missiles were in Washington when it was destroyed.

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 10:52 AM
reply to post by Azekual

Not baised at all and i never said allies or axis, i just said alot may have been there walking the planet just like they do now, or maybe all the warriors are getting called back to Terra Firma for the big one. I sure as hell dont plan on sitting out of any world war if it comes to my home.
edit on 12-12-2011 by StratosFear because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 11:00 AM
reply to post by Azekual

No way. The United States military could and would continue to function if Washington was wiped off the map. They figured out that way back in the cold war days. The Cheyanne mountains are full off bunkers developed for just a scenario as well as Air Force One is full loaded with all the command and control gear needed to mount a defense. Not to mention the Boomers and Carrier groups around the world which are nuclear equipped as well.
In fact it would probably be more effective without all the politicians if DC was to take a hit

posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 11:10 AM

Originally posted by samlf3rd
We are too smart, and too gangsta. Their armies would have one heck of a time getting through Gary, IN. I remember as a kid if we ever had to drive through Gary we would lock the doors (still do) drive slowly through red lights, etc. You got Cali, crazy people in the sticks, they better not send ground troops. I know how to crete an electric fence from a computer monitor, just so you know.

This is how it would go down in Gary In. " Fire mission, Over. Gangsta's in the buildings. Send HE, Over. Fire for effect, Over"

No more Gangsta's and no more Gary Indiana either "Out"

It would not be a "Red Dawn" Movie, no John Wayne, no Clint, no Bruce Willis, no Tom Berenger Charlie Sheen or Willem Dafoe

A war fought on US soil would be the harshest most bloody HELL any American could imagine. But right now Talk is talk and here on ATS it is rave on!!!

<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in