It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by lambros56
Drones wouldnt be there if Pakistan would not let an Armed Military Force Occupy their country that kills their people , American People , British People , Russians , Chinese.
What's odd about this statement is this is exactly what Pakistan is attempting to do, by giving the US a hard time, seeing as how the US has killed many innocent people on their soil.
So..What you are saying is that Pakistan should not allow armed military forces to occupy their land that kill people..... But the US Military should be allowed to occupy their land and kill people.
So which is it? Is it okay for Pakistan to defend it's soil against occupying forces that kill people, or is it wrong?
You can't have it both ways.
Anyway,just pointing out the odd double speak ( read hypocritical and ironic statement).
Peace and love.
See you around the boards.edit on 10-12-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
The US should also have the Ability to attack any entity that posses a threat to the Civilian population which that threat has killed a few thousand civilian Americans already. That Entity just so happens to be harbored by Pakistan. If you leave them , we will be back there in another 10 years. With a few more thousand dead .. or maybe 10s of thousands. Probably several dirty bombs next time.edit on 04/30/2011 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mayabong
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
If enemy is their desire...fine. Just be MEN, not cowards about saying so. Stop taking billions in our military and foreign aid while telling us our aircraft will be shot down.
P.S.... The next time they have devastating floods or a catastrophic Earthquake, call someone else for sea and airlift of immediate aid and expertise in assisting the population. We ought to just hang up after reminding them of this moment in time. We quite recently made enormous efforts to help their nation after historic flooding... This is the thanks? Yeah... That won't be forgotten.edit on 10-12-2011 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
We'll help you with your flood victims if you will let us bomb weddings of suspected militants with the possibility of killing random civilians in the process. What do you say Pakistan?
Originally posted by iamconcerned
reply to post by nenothtu
Hi, i said 'as the op suggests'. That would mean original poster if i'm not mistaken. That would not be you.
Edit: Oh right I forgot the OP said he was going to nuke China " 'send a crap ton of ICBMs and destroy their infrastructure and bases.' ", hence no need for an occupying force. Silly me. And of course there would be no retaliation. Silly me.edit on 10-12-2011 by iamconcerned because: .edit on 10-12-2011 by iamconcerned because: .
Why would we nuke them? Its called Land Locked. We destroy their navies lock down coasto air space with aircraft , send a crap ton of ICBMs and destroy their infrastructure and bases.
Originally posted by againuntodust
America has no place in Pakistan, we are not at war with them. And you cannot be at war with an idea, like terrorism. A faceless, nationless, amorphous idea that applies to anyone you wish it to when you want it to. Give me break.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by nenothtu
Yeah, it IS called "invasion of airspace", but not really "invading", although I suppose one could see it as that if one were so inclined.
It IS invading a sovereign nation. I don't care if it's by land, sea or air.
It is what happens when one harbors the enemies of another, and that "other" takes exception to that.
Yah, allies are highly overrated. Can't hardly tell them apart anyway. Especially form altitude, at night, by remote control. (Cowards, backstabbers)
Been going on since the dawn of history.
So, that makes it alright then.
We'll just further enhance our image as frenemy and make it clear to all where we stand. (Alone)
just so there is no "I can bear arms too... see my tan line" too Bush Jr, "P" Act and
In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two Second Amendment decisions. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Additionally, the Court enumerated several longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession that it found were consistent with the Second Amendment. In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.
this is the best of Cheney . note extreme sarcasm
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know.
We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know. ”
—Former United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
do you not the the ironic? oh I left out Bush Jr.
He directed the United States invasion of Panama and Operation Desert Storm in the Middle East. In 1991 he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bush.
ok 10 years, but then whose counting?
The most significant event of President Bush’s tenure came on September 11, 2001, when terrorists killed nearly 3,000 people on American soil. President Bush responded with a comprehensive strategy to protect the American people. He led the most dramatic reorganization of the federal government since the beginning of the Cold War, reforming the intelligence community and establishing new institutions like the Department of Homeland Security. He built global coalitions to remove violent regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq that threatened America; liberating more than 50 million people from tyranny. He recognized that freedom and hope are the best alternative to the extremist ideology of the terrorists, so he provided unprecedented American support for young democracies and dissidents in the Middle East and beyond. In the more than seven years after September 11, 2001, the United States was not attacked again.
US Drones to be shot down (Pakistan)