It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BUSINESS: US army to split up Halliburton's no-bid contract in Iraq

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 7 2004 @ 10:34 AM
link   
The US Army today announced plans that it was breaking up the multi-billion no bid contract of Halliburton to provide services in Iraq. It indicated that about 13 Billion dollars woth of contracts would be opened for bidding. They described the move as being more efficient.
 



news.yahoo.com
PARIS (AFP) - The US army plans to break up a multi-billion-dollar contract awarded to services group Halliburton to feed, house and look after troops in Iraq (news - web sites), the Wall Street Journal Europe reported.
The move, which the report said had been announced in an internal memorandum, includes putting contracts worth up to 13 billion dollars (11 billion euros) out for competitive bidding.

It comes more than a year after Halliburton won the controversial no-bid deal, which has been the target of accounting problems and allegations of overcharging.

Vice President Dick Cheny was the group's chief executive until he took office in 2001, but has denied any lingering ties to the company.

US defense department officials were quoted by the newspaper as saying that the decision to rebid the work was not meant to penalize Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), the Halliburton division that handles work in Iraq.




Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


Cheney used to be the CEO and the award of the no-bid contract was fishy to say the least. While it will be more efficient, there is consistent evidence that the company was charging the government too much for alot of services. ITs much better to spread the wealth around to other countries. However, countries that were part of the coalition should recieve these contracts and not others.



[edit on 7-9-2004 by John bull 1]



posted on Sep, 7 2004 @ 02:17 PM
link   
FredT,

I beg to differ. There actually wasn't anything "fishy" about the fact that a Halliburton subsidiary was awarded the "no-bid contract". The bidding process for government contracts is a long and involved process, and is often bypassed in the quick run-up to a conflict. If I recall correctly, Halliburton was awarded a similar "no-bid" contract for the Kosovo conflict by the Clinton administration.

I won't defend Halliburton for over charging for services etc. However the awarding of the contract itself was legit.

-Cypher



 
0

log in

join