It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Could be,but I think the travel didn't happened yet.
Originally posted by marvinthemartian
reply to post by diamondsmith
Isnt it from the same year that motorola was founded? thats a bit strange.
You don't speak to a hearing device.
Originally posted by roughycannon
I remember this from a few years ago, was it not confirmed that it was a hearing aid she was holding?
timothybaril.com...edit on 10-12-2011 by roughycannon because: (no reason given)
Hard to explain.It's a very unusual scene,from a moment in time,1923.
Originally posted by Just Chris
Extremely unusual, but who knows how to explain what we're seeing!?
No the tech was from around 2012 or +.
Originally posted by ZeroReady
I thought we couldn't travel back in time to a point before the machine was invented. That's what I've heard from theoretical physicists like Dr Michio Kaku. So If the person in the film is a time traveler, then the tech was around in the 1920's??
His base station in the future through his time vortex tunnel.
Originally posted by Zaphod
reply to post by diamondsmith
And what cell towers or satellites do you imagine her phone was connected to?
Maybe the technology was invented but never used yet.
Originally posted by ZeroReady
reply to post by diamondsmith
Then according to what we think we know about time travel, this person could not be a time traveler. Of course it's all theory, but if the technology to travel back in time won't be invented till after next year, then we won't be able to go back to before that time. Right?
Originally posted by SecuritySeeker
reply to post by diamondsmith
In the video the "time traveler" is transparent, it looks imposed to me. You can see the back ground through her/his hat.