It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by Chewingonmushrooms
Question for you: If Democrats held all the seats in congress and senate, held the presidency and had all members on the Supreme Court would that really change things? I am not talking about cosmetic minor changes, I am talking about real change. Monetary policy, environmental policy, and foreign policy just to point out a few would all remain the same.
...
Oh boy... Don't you know this has happened SEVERAL times, and every time it ended up the same way?
You actually think that democrats are so good for the people?
As some other members and I have been tyring to remind leftwingers like yourself, progressive democrats, under a democrat president in 1913 passed MAJOR legislation which included the Federal Reserve Act, or what people call The Feds, The IRS as it exists today with it's PROGRESSIVE taxes, and other legislation and even regulations that stopped the economic growth of the United States in general and gave power to a few people.
Until not too long ago DEMOCRATS were a majority, again, in the House, and the Sentate, not to mention that we have another PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT as President, and what exactly have they been doing?... You tell us...
edit on 30-12-2011 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jacklondonmiller
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Communism= the state owns everything
Anarchism=the state owns nothing.
SIMPLE
There is no reason to be confused. Only the PTB want everyone to be confused and keep voting center-left or center-right.
State = LAWS to protect private property and enforce contracts
NO STATE = No LAWS to protect private property or enforce contracts
That is the dualityedit on 22-12-2011 by jacklondonmiller because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
You completely ignore that recent debt was built up almost entirely under conservative/republican admins.
Current Conservatives have no respect for the U.S. constitution, they want to pretend that corporations do not abuse the rights of the people, and turn all power over to a global corporate empire, that will enslave us all if given the opportunity. They got you obsessed with 1913, when all you have to look at is the 8 years GW held office, and what his regime did the the people of the U.S., how they stripped our liberties and redistributed our wealth into the pockets of the International Corporate Bankers in support of a Global Corporate Empire.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
You completely ignore that recent debt was built up almost entirely under conservative/republican admins.
Current Conservatives have no respect for the U.S. constitution, they want to pretend that corporations do not abuse the rights of the people, and turn all power over to a global corporate empire, that will enslave us all if given the opportunity. They got you obsessed with 1913, when all you have to look at is the 8 years GW held office, and what his regime did the the people of the U.S., how they stripped our liberties and redistributed our wealth into the pockets of the International Corporate Bankers in support of a Global Corporate Empire.
Apparently your not good enough at what you do to represent your self.
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Dilligaf28
Workers = "We the people" = "the governed".
Or does being a worker somehow exclude one from those classes?
.
Apparently if you are not a boss, you should not get representation.