It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CNN covers Mysterious Objects Near Mercury

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 11:40 AM
link   
..and than attempts to Debunk it. Ive seen a few threads posted on this subject, but my jaw almost hit the floor when I saw CNN covering it!

I dont understand his explanations 100% to be honest...

Cnn Video

Hah, at the end the Anchor said it perfectly, "would have been a better story if it was a space ship."
edit on 10-12-2011 by truthinfact because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 11:45 AM
link   
it seems like a bs cover.
i don't think its a spaceship but i doubt its the old picture...



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   
Why would they want to cover it up ? with the huge amount of UFO data out there they choose so so call debunk this piece if so why ? even if the said they were not sure what is was would it have made a difference ? it would have been a better story in my opinion.
edit on 10-12-2011 by judus because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 11:57 AM
link   
I know that this has debunked ad nausium, but that guy's explaination of 2 pictures, is total BS, IMHO! I don't know what it is but Phage's explaination of "subtraction" makes more sense than this.



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Phage should write to CNN. Hey maybe they could even name drop ATS. Good PR



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by truthinfact
 



Allready posted
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Allready posted
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Allready posted
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by FonsoHarman
it seems like a bs cover.
i don't think its a spaceship but i doubt its the old picture...


Well, the "overlayered-old-image-spot" explanation of the CNN guy is a TOTAL and UTTER BS. If that object was just a artifact created by the CME, it could have been easily explained, but the way that guy did it, totally sounded like a HUGE cover up. NASA shills on ATS (you know who) will have a hard work to convince people that the explanation of CNN was not shenanigans.



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by windword
I know that this has debunked ad nausium, but that guy's explaination of 2 pictures, is total BS, IMHO! I don't know what it is but Phage's explaination of "subtraction" makes more sense than this.


Hmmm... It seems that NASA shills didn't combine their bunk explanations.



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:37 PM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 


He he, looks like NASA got caught with it's proverbial pant down, and on fire!



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 12:52 PM
link   
allready posted here
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Its funny how the CNN explanation is alot differant from the "official" explanation from NASA on their website.



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by wlasikiewicz
 

Yes.
Idiot talking heads seldom get anything having to do with science correct.



posted on Dec, 10 2011 @ 08:46 PM
link   
There is a thread on this topic already located here.

Please add to the ongoing thread.

Closed.

Thank You.

~Keeper
ATS Moderator



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join