New World Order Linked to European Alliances, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-4-2003 @ 01:23 PM by MilanLoyalty
Thanks for the thoughts, even though my wording of the discussion is a little odd, I wrote this around 5 AM this morning.

But back to the topic at hand, I wouldn't want war either, heck no. If this should Occur it would simply be WW3.

Britain will never side with Europe, 2 reasons

1.) Europe with the New EURO Coin, is already planning to be United in some way, without Britain, they don't even accept the EURO, they don't even want to be part of Europe.

2.) One of the Reasons I ever wrote this Discussion is because I ACTUALLY SAW BLAIR SAY THIS, he said that US-Britain Alliance must stop and opposing Superpower constructed of French, German, Russian and Others............in order to do this they think they have to solve the war and make Peace between Israel and Palestine, ( I don't understand this, especially since the US has treated Palestine like washed up dogs ever since Israel took over the palestinian Land?

Last and Most Important, I FEEL THAT THE WAR ON IRAQ WAS THE MOST IDIOTIC MOVE EVER. This is what it did, It changed everything.

It basically said that The United States doesnt give 2 cents about the United Nations or International Law, they will do what they please and no one gets in their way.

The world doesn't want this, maybe the US cictizens do, but Europeans don't, therefore, Because Things are changing.....very fast Europeans will try to form or unite another Superpower to keep the United States and its allies from doing what they please.

NATO is gone my friends, United States proved that In these conditions They don't Care what NATO says, they do what they want.

So it looks like we will have the COLD WAR all over again, and we can Thank 1 man, George W. Bush and his desperate Desire To flex his muscles and Overtake Iraq and their Oil Fields.


reply posted on 13-4-2003 @ 05:18 AM by quango
Originally posted by ultra_phoenix
And what about NATO ? They have to break up NATO first. Otherwise, that anti-USA/GB coalition will not be effective. All the EU nations are NATO members ( except the Russians, but they're not in the EU ).

Also, all the EU nations & the USA are ( normally ), democratic nations. I don't see 10 or more democratic nations fighting VS each others. It doesn't make sense.

And don't forget that the EU citizens are NOT a bunch of super-Rambo who want to fight with everybody. The EU ( and the Russians ) had to suffer two world war on their own soil, and they don't want to do it one more time. Europe has learned her lesson. DON'T DO WAR ( or if you have to do it, don't do it at home, do it somewhere else ).


1-
One could argue that the US by 'disobeying' the UN, has set the stage for some other country(s) to act 'in defense of the EU', thereby 'acting seperate from NATO'


2-
People battling for the mass following is what happens WITHIN a democracy, so it seems only fitting that it would happen BETWEEN democracies.
Just, instead of people battling (politically) for a country, it's nations battling (politically -or even militarily-) for control of the world.

3-
Or even better, Let someone else fight for you.
IOW, Israel vs. the Arabs - Let the US/GB back one and the EU/Asia back the other and let those two countries fight it out. "who cares about jews or arabs, anyway"

That's what the NWO thinks, and the US/GB and EU/Asia are in it together saying, "As long as one of us wins and not the Jews or Arabs. We'll let them destroy themselves while they decide the outcome for us."



of course, that's just a theory.


reply posted on 4-5-2003 @ 09:14 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
EU, UN, US, ect, its all part of the same game people. The goal for one world govornment approaches closer and closer, an ultra liberal Brave new World type planet, a utopia of hell.

If Europe didnt wan the US rampaging and bombing the # out of countries. they should have thought of that before they pissed away thier power and empires in two stupid and very avoidable world wars. Europe has no one but Europe to blame for its current state of afairs: Europe has shown time and time again in the past it cant be trusted to behave on its own. Hell, Europe has no military leg to stand on for a reason : WE disarmed them. A good call, too, because we were getting just a might bit sick of getting dragged into two bloody world wars that really didnt have anything to do with us. You bitch about how we run the world. I laugh. If it wasnt for European incompetance repeatedly, the US would still be happily sitting, a backwaters nation, enjoying its beloved isolation and not having to deal with all the BS. Id have rather never seen my beloved country become the Super power. We lost our innocence and security when we became the power. We lost the wildness and freedom because we now faced new threats. Before world war one, we didnt have the IRS or other such agencies. We were minimally involved in world affairs. Now.......were slipping into nightmare. All because of #ing Europe.

Quit your whining. You had your chance, you owned the world, and you blew it. so, dont condemn us when we do the same things u did. We learned at your knee how to run the world. We are simply imitating you now.

And dont get me started about the British.......lets not go into a list of the lovely things they have done.......gassing Iraq, Opium wars, slaughter of Boer farmers, ect............almost make us look like saints
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 1 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 10 days ago with 10 member flags