Why do people work for money..., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 9-12-2011 @ 04:00 PM by 2Isee3rd
reply to post by DarthMuerte



Any kind of work UNDER an employer, whether it be for money to buys needless things or for bare necessities, is slavery.


reply posted on 9-12-2011 @ 04:19 PM by Omphale
Originally posted by 74Templar
Originally posted by WarJohn
...instead of things to keep? Things consistant for modern living... Like: water, food, automobile, shelter, utilities, T.V., computer, phone, vacuum, etc. and etc.

What is the difference between giving you things to keep instead of money for work, so you can live decent?

I'd like a job that will give for me to use and keep a READY-MADE, FURNISHED COMPLETE HOME, so to speak, that comes with an automobile. Yep, instead of money that is what I'd rather get for working for some employer.


Really simple, the government can't make money off the barter system, because it gives power back to the people. They can hide it behind the whole "there are people who have nothing to offer" bs, but you only have to look at how many fingers (aka taxes) the government has in our pies to see they wouldn't benefit from such a system. Each time you purchase any of the things you mentioned, as well as working for the cash you are paid the government skims (or digs in more cases) it's stake, often before you even see your money.


In most cases, and my strongest objection to compulsory PAYE taxation, you have absolutely no control over how those monies that you contribute are spent. You do, to some extent, by elected government, but in most modern governments, Britain especially, there are elements of national funding that are not the remit of that government, or certainly not to sole remit. The decision to go to war, for example, is seldom a decision solely for the elected government. As there is no option to opt out for the pacifist or concientious objector, the only other alternative is to cease paying tax by earning an income below the taxation limit, but that is no limit to live on.

By accepting a non-monetary reward for my labour I have found a way to not pay income tax but still have a reasonable, liveable income. Both needs and principles met without too much compromise either side. Even my employer has tax free, non-profit status.

The simple fact is, there are ways to make the system work for you, ways to gain a position in which to enact change, ways to set an example, but you will never achieve anything, but the run of the mill ordinary, if you begin with a defeatist attitude. You find what you are looking for.

Where there's a will, there's a way. As they say.


reply posted on 9-12-2011 @ 06:04 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by WarJohn



Erm .. without money there is no consumerism, without consumerism there is no drive for innovation. That means without consumerism, ie, money, there would be no computers, cell phones, flat screen TV's, huge houses and automobiles.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Mainstream Media IGNORES Iceland Revolution
  Posted 9 days ago with 96 member flags
Here Are The 5 Worst Places To Be When The Dollar Collapses
  Posted 6 days ago with 19 member flags
The Coming Canadian Housing Crash
  Posted 16 days ago with 18 member flags
What is *THE* domino you\'re waiting for, and why?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Google Trends - The Powers That Be should be scared
  Posted 2 days ago with 16 member flags
Greece bank run
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags
25 May 2012 (the day europe collapsed)
  Posted 5 days ago with 14 member flags
Facebook insider sales are huge red flags
  Posted 11 days ago with 13 member flags