It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by jjf3rd77
The simple fact is this...... If world war 3 starts, there won't be any Republicans or Democrats left around to blame, social structure as we know it will completely break down and our pathetic two party system will break down and fail. Even if America wins such a war, our Constitution and everything that we are accustomed will be gone. Brave new world, all of that.
Originally posted by Ghost375
So where's your argument for "why republicans will be blamed?"
unless I'm mistaken, all you say is NATO is going to be responsible for WWIII. Did I miss something?
Well, I see the sentence I missed. What you say makes sense now.
lol, you're right...the republicans openly say they want a war with Iran, which we all know would lead to WWIII.
It would be a good strategy to get republicans out of the picture for good. But just so you know, republicans want a NWO just as much as Obama does. And they probably both want a war with Iran, Obama's just much more quiet about it.
That said, I expect Obama to win. I'd like RP to win, but that seems very unlikely.
edit on 8-12-2011 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by Ghost375
So where's your argument for "why republicans will be blamed?"
unless I'm mistaken, all you say is NATO is going to be responsible for WWIII. Did I miss something?
Well, I see the sentence I missed. What you say makes sense now.
lol, you're right...the republicans openly say they want a war with Iran, which we all know would lead to WWIII.
It would be a good strategy to get republicans out of the picture for good. But just so you know, republicans want a NWO just as much as Obama does. And they probably both want a war with Iran, Obama's just much more quiet about it.
That said, I expect Obama to win. I'd like RP to win, but that seems very unlikely.
edit on 8-12-2011 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Getting the republicans gone won't be good for anyone. If that's what you mean. We need the two parties and maybe a tea party party and OWS party too! We need more checks and balances.
Yes, I know you've seen the YouTube Videos about every single President since there was television, utter the words New World Order. Alex Jones I think.
Originally posted by Ghost375
Ah, that's not what I meant. I didn't mean to imply that it would be a good thing. No, Dostoevsky taught me how important a role conservatives play. The role they play essentially boils down to preventing liberals from enacting dictatorships; this doesn't mean that liberals are evil...all liberals start out with the intention to promote freedom.
It's more complicated than that...but right now, conservatives(not the politicians) are what's holding back a NWO dictatorship. I just meant to say it would be good for the NWO. I don't think it'd be good at all.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Why Republicans will be blamed for WWIII:
1. Created and fostered the Military-Industrial Complex
2. Decades of Corporatism in the Mid-East, exploiting them for oil
3. Launched unilateral wars in the Mid-East - Iraq (v.2) was all about oil and making $$$
4. Foreign Policy that is right out of the 1800's - exploit poor nations, military interventionism, forced treaties favorable to US corporations (look up Gen. Smedley Butler "War is a Racket"
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Why Republicans will be blamed for WWIII:
1. Created and fostered the Military-Industrial Complex
2. Decades of Corporatism in the Mid-East, exploiting them for oil
3. Launched unilateral wars in the Mid-East - Iraq (v.2) was all about oil and making $$$
4. Foreign Policy that is right out of the 1800's - exploit poor nations, military interventionism, forced treaties favorable to US corporations (look up Gen. Smedley Butler "War is a Racket"
1. Actually, it began under two Democrats, Roosevelt and Truman. Eisenhower, a Republican actually warned the nation about it. After Kennedy's assassination, the Complex literally astronomically expanded under Johnson, a Democrat.
In 1977, following the Vietnam war, U.S. President Jimmy Carter began his presidency with what historian Michael Sherry has called "a determination to break from America's militarized past."[4] However, increased defense spending in the era of President Ronald Reagan was seen by some to have brought the MIC back into prominence. (from Wikipedia)
2. The exploitation of the Middle East began after World War I by the French and British. They placed governments in power that further exploited their own people. The British Empire, placed the House of Saud in power in Arabia. The Saudis control the largest oil corporation on earth. OPEC is the largest cartel of the largest oil corporations on earth.
3. Iraq was not about oil, otherwise we wouldn't have let Iraq sell their oil fields to China. The increased oil prices from the war have benefitted OPEC and Russia the most of anyone.
I'm looking at much more recent times, specifically the unilateral war in Iraq which has greatly destabilized the region.
The F-117 was born after combat experience in the Vietnam War when increasingly sophisticated Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) downed heavy bombers.[12] It was a black project, an ultra-secret program for much of its life, until the late 1980s.[13] The project began in 1975 with a model called the "Hopeless Diamond"
Carter was just entering office when the prototypes were being delivered.
Congress canceled the MBT-70 in November and XM803 December 1971, and redistributed the funds to the new XM815, later renamed the XM1 Abrams after General Creighton Abrams. Prototypes were delivered in 1976 by Chrysler Defense and General Motors
The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was proposed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Now here is something to really think about, since you mentioned "corporatism" or what I prefer to call Plutocracy, the Military Industrial Complex is just a link in the food chain.
Even then they are not at the top of the food chain, as they are not the ultimate source of financial capital, i.e. the money suppliers. The money suppliers are the ones who ultimately profit from every financial activity undertaken by humans on this planet and which the entire global power structure revolves around.
If you want blame anyone for World War 3, or 2 and 1 for that matter, the buck stops with them.