It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by PrimalRed
Oh? Show me how it's not true.
Originally posted by PrimalRed
They keep a lot of their money overseas and out of the country, why should they pay an American tax on foreign business. 1/2 of their workforce is not even in America anymore.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by PrimalRed
Benefit/rebate/refund are all words that in this context mean the same thing, it is the dollars the US Treasury pays you after you file your income tax return.
What Does Tax Benefit Mean?
A tax benefit is an allowable deduction on a tax return intended to reduce a taxpayer's burden while typically supporting certain types of commercial activity. A tax benefit allows some type of adjustment benefiting a taxpayer's tax liability.
Read more: www.investopedia.com...
tax refund
Definition
The return by the government of excess taxes paid by an individual. If, during the course of a calendar year, an individual paid more taxes than they actually owed (after taking into consderation income tax, withholdings, tax deductions or credits, and other factors), then he or she will receive a tax refund after filing his or her taxes for the year.
www.gereports.com...
Claim: GE paid no taxes in 2010.
Fact: GE did pay almost $2.7 billion in cash income taxes in 2010 on a consolidated basis (almost 19% of pretax income from continuing operations) globally, including significant U.S. federal income tax payments. GE also paid in excess of $1 billion in payroll, state and local sales and use and property taxes.
Claim: GE “dodges” tax obligations generally.
Fact: Over the past 10 years, GE has paid almost $23 billion of corporate income taxes to governments around the world, making it one of the highest payers of corporate income taxes. Over the past five years alone, GE has paid over $14 billion of income taxes.
Claim: GE used “tax avoidance strategies” to reduce its tax rate the past few years.
Fact: GE’s tax rate has been lower in recent years due to financial crisis losses at GE Capital. From 2008-2010, GE Capital suffered nearly $32 billion in losses as a result of the financial crisis. That’s not a “tax avoidance strategy.” Absent such unusual losses, GE’s overall effective tax rate would have been 15 percent over the past several years, which is comparable to the average for other multinational corporations. Our 2011 tax rate is slated to return to more normal levels with GE Capital’s recovery.
Originally posted by pianopraze
Originally posted by PrimalRed
They keep a lot of their money overseas and out of the country, why should they pay an American tax on foreign business. 1/2 of their workforce is not even in America anymore.
You see no problems with US companies shipping all our US jobs overseas, not paying taxes, and getting money FROM our government in subsidies (e.g. oil) because they pay off our politicians to be able to do this?
The corruption has become so endemic that we are about to collapse as a nation not because we have no money, but because it is being hoarded by the 1 percent.
artists website
And when the benefit subtracted from owed becomes greater than 0, they get the difference in the form of a check! For example if I owe 2,000 but my benefit/deduction is 3,000 I get a check for 1,000 dollars. However you want to slice it every dollar in benefit/rebate/refund given to Corporations comes out of the tax-payer pocket. Are you okay with that when that corporation is in the billions of dollars profit margin!?
"Wow, just when we thought it was over... The NYT may be off the hook, at least on the "federal income tax" assertion. No sooner had we published our conclusion that the NYT's statement was "flat-out wrong" than the NYT came right back and said there wasn't a single factual inaccuracy in its article, which was why GE hadn't asked for a correction. And, more importantly, the NYT sent us an AFP article in which GE spokesperson Anne Eisele--the same spokesperson who wrote the comment below--said the following: "GE did not pay US federal taxes last year because we did not owe any."
it supports the New York Times's position that GE's tax bill was "none." And it suggests that GE is still trying to find a way, any way, to talk its way out of this, even if that means giving out false information. (And it also undermines GE's legitimate gripe that "American tax bill"--the NYT's phrasing--should include things like local, state, and payroll taxes).
Originally posted by PrimalRed
reply to post by Kali74
And when the benefit subtracted from owed becomes greater than 0, they get the difference in the form of a check! For example if I owe 2,000 but my benefit/deduction is 3,000 I get a check for 1,000 dollars. However you want to slice it every dollar in benefit/rebate/refund given to Corporations comes out of the tax-payer pocket. Are you okay with that when that corporation is in the billions of dollars profit margin!?
thanks for the math lesson but they DID NOT get a refund...
Originally posted by PrimalRed
reply to post by Kali74
And when the benefit subtracted from owed becomes greater than 0, they get the difference in the form of a check! For example if I owe 2,000 but my benefit/deduction is 3,000 I get a check for 1,000 dollars. However you want to slice it every dollar in benefit/rebate/refund given to Corporations comes out of the tax-payer pocket. Are you okay with that when that corporation is in the billions of dollars profit margin!?
thanks for the math lesson but they DID NOT get a refund...
www.forbes.com...
All these tax burdens are higher than the average citizen pays. So where does General Electric ( GE - news - people ) stand? Contrary to what many in the public seem to think, the conglomerate did pay taxes in 2010. It reported $2.7 billion in cash tax payments during the year, and on its income statement lists a provision for income taxes of $1.05 billion. Considering GE's pretax income of $14.2 billion, that makes for a tax rate of just 7.4%. The only one of the 20 corporate giants with a lower rate was AT&T ( T - news - people ), at -6.4%--but that was only because MaBell won a tax settlement with the IRS that reduced its tax liability by $8.3 billion.
Originally posted by PrimalRed
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
They are just confused over the terms used, they do not see the difference between a refund and a benefit and they do not see the difference between federal tax and federal income tax.edit on 7-12-2011 by PrimalRed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PrimalRed
"the 99%" do not all pay income tax, many of "the 99%" do not make enough money to pay income tax.
Personally I am against federal income tax so i say more power to them.