It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by questforevidence
"How stupid would a girl have to be to use this? It would only work if the rape could be predicted and the device inserted, even then it's suicidal. The only thing that would happen is the guy would kill the girl for sure"
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Originally posted by Skorpiogurl
And let's not forget about the childrens version...
Agreed. With all the pedophiles teaching at schools these days, it might be a mandatory accessory for any and all of your children.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
So you would insert some intrusive device into a child to prevent someone from intrusively inserting something into a child?
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I'm all for natural consequences, and revenge, and I'd gladly jump onto a posse and go dole out some justice, but I'm not advocating that anybody put anything inside the parts of a child. I won't even let the doctor take my kids temperature rectally, not even when they were babies.
How about this, just make sure everyone knows who their Daddy is, and what their Daddy is capable of, and the fact that their Daddy doesn't have a lot of moral reservations with doling out an extremely disproportionate form of justice? That seems like a better deterrent to me.
For folks around here the phrase is, "if you don't know, you better ask somebody." Hell, that even extends to the authorities. I had a SWAT team at my house a few years ago, and they knocked politely, allowed my mother to collect a few things before before being cuffed, and my dog survived. The full account is on ATS in one of the "positive" cop threads. It was a bogus charge trumped up as a retaliation over a lawsuit in another state, but that is beside the point. The point is, a reputation is a far better deterrent than some silly device.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by AGWskeptic
Good point. In SA a lot of the rapes are gang rapes, so I hear. It's like gang rape is a fad in that country along with genocide but that's a whole other topic.
They shouldn't hold any type of major event in that God forsaken country anyways. I've seen the rape/HIV statistics for that country. It's highly disturbing to say the least.
I am all for the Rape-Axe condom. It would at least prevent solo rapes.
but I'm not advocating that anybody put anything inside the parts of a child
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
that is actually a better idea, but would be much more expensive.
put enough sedative in to knock someone out quick. it takes 20 seconds for blood to make a full circle and return to where it started, so if it is delivered into the blood stream at a sufficient dose, it could be very effective, and she wouldn't be subject to retaliation.
the other problem with this is that any drug that could accomplish this, such as etorphine hydrochloride (an extremely powerful animal tranquilizer. 5mg to knock a rhino out) isn't something that should be so easy to obtain. someone who wanted to rape women could just as easily buy one of these, take the sedative out, and inject them with it. druggies could probably also use it, as it is tens of thousands of times stronger than morphine if injected.
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
Tired of being raped? Want his worst fears to be realized? Try the NEW and Improved RAPE-AXE Condom!
Over 30,000 Rape-Axe condoms are being handed out free at South Africa’s World Cup. While they won’t stop rape, the condoms (worn by women) have jagged-teeth inside to tear penises up, and can only be removed by doctors.
edit on 7-12-2011 by cerebralassassins because: (no reason given)