It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mastahunta
Its funny,
From the conservative sphere you here a lot of talk about government spending being bad,
yet Reagan was the first president in history to run our nation on such a massive debt platform.
Doesn't that compute with anyone? Or is all the talk, just talk?
Reagan, raised taxes MORE than socialist Obama too... Go figure that one.
I think the core essence of conservatism has NOTHING to do with actions or policy,
case in point this thread, it just feels good.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by mastahunta
Its funny,
From the conservative sphere you here a lot of talk about government spending being bad,
yet Reagan was the first president in history to run our nation on such a massive debt platform.
Doesn't that compute with anyone? Or is all the talk, just talk?
Reagan, raised taxes MORE than socialist Obama too... Go figure that one.
I think the core essence of conservatism has NOTHING to do with actions or policy,
case in point this thread, it just feels good.
and you could ignore the fact that Reagan was the one person that posited less government over all things. Or you could just be a hippie liberal spewing talking points.
You pick. and that whole recovery thing after Jimmah Carter got ousted (with a vengeance) was attributed to who? again?edit on 7-12-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)
ALAN SIMPSON (Republican, Wyoming): Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his administration. I was here. I was here. I knew him. Better than anybody in this room. He was a dear friend and a total realist as to politics.
Originally posted by tangonine
It's sesame street time:
Big Government = bad
No Government = good
It's pretty damn simple, really
Originally posted by groingrinder
reply to post by SLAYER69
You seriously think that clown Reagan telling Gorby to tear down the wall is why it came down? Russia was bankrupted by trying to keep up with our defense spending. IT HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH RONNIE REAGAN. It merely happened to coincidentally happen during his term. IT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED NO MATTER WHO WAS PRESIDENT AT THAT TIME.
It was the failure of Communism that brought down Russia, not Ronald Reagan's mouth.
Let's not forget the CIA had a field day under Ronnie importing Cocaine and bringing down legitimate governments the world over so that US Corporations could have a favorable business environment overseas.
The best thing Ronnie ever did was get shot.
Originally posted by mastahunta
reply to post by tangonine
And conservative who exalt the liberal Reagan are even more !
How do you like those 11 tax increases?
Originally posted by mastahunta
Its funny,
From the conservative sphere you here a lot of talk about government spending being bad,
yet Reagan was the first president in history to run our nation on such a massive debt platform.
Doesn't that compute with anyone? Or is all the talk, just talk?
Reagan, raised taxes MORE than socialist Obama too... Go figure that one.
I think the core essence of conservatism has NOTHING to do with actions or policy,
case in point this thread, it just feels good.
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
No we don't
Go research the GE pitchman before you get all nostalgic. The reason we have the candidates that we do is because they're the ones that the corporations bought and paid for. (Research the top contributors for the democratic and republican candidate in the last 3 elections). Same Corporations.edit on 6-12-2011 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hawking
reply to post by tangonine
The last thing we need is more trickle-down Reaganomics BS. Followed by in-office senility
Originally posted by Cassius666
If Ronald Reagan wouldnt have been such an hardass on unions, there could be a somewhat sounder economy in America, with inflation being driven to a greater degree by raising incomes, rather than just by corporate profits, which benefit mostly shareholders. Right now we are seeing the dreaded "side effects" of Reaganomics. People on a fixed income in the lower income bracket have been squeezed as hard as possible. They cant work any longer or take any more jobs. The next step would be to expect them to accept a lower standard of living, while working the same ammount.