It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Kim Kardashian Loved Someone Enough to Get Married
Obama's CIA Family
News Corp Spy Scandal
Japan's Tsunami an Attack by HAARP
Occupy Wall Street
Osama Bin Laden's Death
Penn State Pedophilia Cover-Up
The Bankruptcy and Missing Funds of MF Global
The Wand That Waved Around the Arab Spring
The DSK Setup
UFOs in Oakland
Herman Cain And 999
Originally posted by fairguy
reply to post by kdog1982
hey i wasnt tryin to get anyone to bite or anything, just post yer stuff whatever the topic
you're right about about the HAARP fanatics
Author Jose Arguelles called the date "the ending of time as we know it" in a 1987 book that spawned an army of Mayan theorists, whose speculations on a cataclysmic end abound online. But specialists meeting at this ancient Mayan city in southern Mexico say it merely marks the termination of one period of creation and the beginning of another. "We have to be clear about this. There is no prophecy for 2012," said Erik Velasquez, an etchings specialist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). "It's a marketing fallacy."
Originally posted by ILikeStars
Originally posted by JonU2
You're really not following any logical rules with some of these....
What is so logical about rules? Do you logically believe you are going to live long enough to even learn the number of rules that exist?
What are the number of rules and laws that exist? How many mandatory expectations would I have to conform to, and comply with, in order to be a law abiding citizen in your neck of the woods?
Are you sure I'm not following any logical rules .... or is it you who may lack the experience needed to know what all the rules mean when held in context with eachother simultaneously?
I'm not really following any logical rules?
Where do said logical rules want to lead me to?
Originally posted by JonU2
Oh, I get it, your theory, with regard to the composition of words, has no rules. It just occurs now and again - the words that follow your theory are the ones that you highlight and the ones that don't should be ignored?
Theories are easier than i'd imagined.......