It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by brokedown
reply to post by SoulDarkness
You still don’t get it.
These are NOT firefighters, they are farmers, cattlemen, construction workers, factory workers, the kid that works the counter at the general store.
It is just a group of people who have gotten together and have pledge their assistance to each other, no one else.
Originally posted by DickGozinya
You don't pay your bill, you don't get fire assistance. What's the problem with that scenario? No one burned to death they just lost their stuff. Next time they'll pay the bill and maybe not lose their trailer.
Originally posted by brokedown
reply to post by fworkman
You are exactly correct.
This is the attitude this family chose, of their own free will.
Now when they fall victim to their own lack of caring for their neighbors they want to complain.
Sorry, I hate your bad luck, let this be a lesson for each of us. We MUST take an active role in the life of our community, we must hold out a helping hand to our neighbors.
However, if you chose not to do so, don’t complain about it latter.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by brokedown
All I can say is those fire fighters would probably need to start looking for somewhere else to live. You do not stop caring for your fellow human beings and animals...when you stop caring you cease to be a human - more so when it is over something as petty as less than a hundred bucks.
Much Peace...particularly for those who now have no home...
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by brokedown
All I can say is those fire fighters would probably need to start looking for somewhere else to live. You do not stop caring for your fellow human beings and animals...when you stop caring you cease to be a human - more so when it is over something as petty as less than a hundred bucks.
Much Peace...particularly for those who now have no home...
I'm not sure how it will work for that community but the rare time someone in the rural areas here has a fire where they didn't pay and it burns, no one has a whole lot of sympathy for it. Now I have never seen or heard of anyone gloating or joking or feeling anything but rather sad it happened. No question it's a tragedy..but such is life in rural America where the services are volunteer based.
One person on this thread said it better than I've heard it put in a long while.. 'You have to be a friend to have a friend'. What a great way to say it. I also rather favor the saying that if someone isn't part of their community's solutions, no one is going to get hurt helping them with their problems.....not unless lives are directly at risk. No lives were at risk here and perhaps they pay their bill next time.
Originally posted by fworkman
You quoted "You have to be a friend to have a friend". Who makes the first move to be the friend?
Originally posted by brokedown
reply to post by fworkman
I would think that would be a TIME issue.
Who had the opportunity to be the friend first.
The family did in this event.
reply to post by fworkman
Text is it morally right to not help even though they did not pay when the firefighters are at the scene and could have helped?