posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 08:10 PM
I'm sorry I don't have anything new to share with you guys but my own thoughts.
First of all, I'm from Finland and I was 13 years old during the disaster of M/S Estonia. Believe it or not, I have not seen or heard anything
considering this tragedy but the official statement many many years ago. I think that proofs the medias don't want to hassle with the pandora's
Yesterday I found Estonia MayDay audiostreams from youtube just accidentaly when I was watching some other videos. Same time I listened the
radioconversation dropping couple of tears on the floor, I started to read the user comments on the videos. Quickly I was amazed by these theories and
conclusions. I started to realize, something does not add up in this scenario. Just like in 9/11 events. I googled a bit and started to find
resources. I read the whole heiwaco page and other sources as well. I got so deep into finding what actually happened, I didn't want to go to sleep.
Today I continued searching all the possible sources and evidences and I really have to say, I'm shocked.
You all know the same I know, propably little bit more so no need to refrase everything. Just couple of thoughts of mine:
1) Estonia was definetely sank intentionally, not by waves and bad weather. The reason for so quick sinking is caused by the hole in the
superstructure. You don't need much scientific explanations to proof what actually happens if the water would only come in to the cardeg on front of
the ship leaving 3(?) floors below cardeg fully undamaged and gas/water sealed. Common sense and few simple calculations would show the ship wouldn't
sink while lying 180' tilted(or listed .. what's the word anyway) having 3 undamaged floors full of air on top of it. It's like trying to sank a
bloody football. Ever tried?
2) I don't say what caused the hole to the superstructure, but THAT is for sure the reason Estonia sank so quickly. JAIC denying the damage in the
hull makes it funny to see the hole in Jutta's video afterwards. Maybe a big fish collided in to the wreck of Estonia just before Jutta got there..
Oh wait, we don't have that big fishes here in Baltic sea.
Anyway, there are too much evidence to show what actually happened, so the question is: Who can you trust nowdays? I have believed in something these
days. After 9/11 attacks, I told myself at least I'm living in a place where nothing like that could EVER happen. Not here in Scandinavia. But I was
wrong. And the big reason for this event to take a place is our beloved neighbour and it's ex-USSR-generals who wants to make some money. Why all
these 3 nations (SWE, FI, EST) are covering up something and yet everything? I would quess because they are not afraid about the truth but the
consiquenses if the truth would be revealed. What is so terrible to be afraid of to do all this cover-ups. Maybe a very powerful instance or nation?
Make your own judgements. I have made my own.
Still it's so confusing to me, that no big actions are not taken to this manner even all this evidences, testimonys etc. are there. Just like U.S
attacking to anywhere in this planet and no-one dares to say a beeping word. We live in a very corrupted world and I AM SO SHAME OF IT.
If we go back to time when example Hitler did everything he did, I would have to say, he wasn't so different from the leaders this day. Even he
claimed to be one of the most brutals leaders in the world, I find more sickness from case Estonia and case 9/11. The difference is nowdays the
leaders doesn't have the balls to stand behind acts. Nations and instances are covering up events after another. And after 70 years when all
key-personnel has died, the cases are reopened and everything changes. What does it matter anymore?
Corrupted politicans and highly ranked leaders scares me most. They can do what they want coverment funding it. And people trying to proof them wrong
are stamped as Conspiracy-Fools.
Laws of physics and common sense doesn't count in events like these