How did the 'Estonia' sink 1994?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 58 times


reply posted on 17-3-2007 @ 05:13 PM by Hellmutt
Remember this post from page 3?

Today Mona Sahlin became the new leader of Sweden's Social Democratic Party. That means she might become the next prime minister of Sweden. And if she does, I expect she will make sure that we will never know the truth about Estonia...


reply posted on 22-3-2007 @ 01:59 PM by Hellmutt
Today, a team probing the sinking of ferry Estonia announced they have found no evidence of any explosion being the cause of the sinking. They'll continue the investigation until October 15 as there are still some unclear issues, like how and why the ferry Estonia were sinking so quickly.


Explosion ruled out in Estonia probe

22nd March 2007



An Estonian team probing the sinking of a passenger ferry 12-and-a-half years ago, which claimed 852 lives, said Thursday it had no evidence to show the accident was caused by an explosion

Also Thursday, the Estonian government extended the mandate of the probe commission by six months, until October 15, to allow it to clear up still unclear issues, including why the ferry went down so quickly.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.



reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 12:22 PM by makeitso
While the report says no explosion, the same report indicates the possiblity.

Estonian report says ferry that sank in 1994 might be carrying weapons

It says weaponry that Estonian officials knew nothing about might have been loaded into the ferryboat’s holds.

Apprehensions of exposure of the cargo might have prompted someone to get rid of it by throwing it overboard, and this was exactly what led to a disaster on the stormy night, Feniks experts surmised.


Questions:
How would throwing weaponry overboard lead to the disaster?

" An explosion on board the ferry can be ruled out , based on the findings of the commission," Estonian Justice Minister Rein Lang told reporters.
Explosion ruled out


Is saying that there was no explosion ON BOARD just semantics? Did the explosion occur just alongside the ferry when the weaponry was thrown overboard? What weapons would explode when exposed to cold saltwater?

Wish I could find that report...


[edit on 3/25/07 by makeitso]


reply posted on 10-5-2007 @ 04:18 PM by Hellmutt
I've found lots of articles in swedish and norwegian, but only two in english. Here's the other english article I've found. From a swedish news site and translated into english (like the other one). Why are english speaking media so silent about this?

Estonia Explosion Not Ruled Out

***

And here's from a blog.

Vilhelm Konnander's weblog: Was M/S Estonia sunk by an explosion?

May 10, 2007

A new Swedish-German expert group on the 1994 M/S Estonia catastrophe does not exclude an explosion as cause of the shipwreck.

[---]

The catastrophe occurred little over a month after the last Russian troops had left Estonian soil. It thus came at an inconvenient moment for Estonia, as the country had just regained full sovereignty over its territory. Consequently, the stage was set for widespread speculations and conspiracy theories.

This blogger doesn't seem to believe that it was any conspiracy involved, but I'm convinced that it was one or more explosions and coverups.

All the recent articles seems to have concluded that the bow visor was the reason for the sinking, because it was found separated from the wreck. However, if there was a coverup, the bow visor might have been separated after the accident to make it look like the cause. We need more divings in order to better examine the wreck. Divings are currently not allowed because it will "disturb the peace" (yeah, right...)

[edit on 2007/5/10 by Hellmutt]


reply posted on 11-5-2007 @ 03:08 AM by FedtStensDyr
Just found the webpage for Nautilus, the publisher of the above mentioned book. And the book is about Scandinavian Star, a passenger ship that burned in 1990.The book is about Mike Axdal and his fight for the truth(I guess). In their oppinion it shows something about democracy and justice in Denmark.
Unless it sheds light on a larger scheme Estonia could fit into I don´t think it is of much relevance.

[edit on 11-5-2007 by FedtStensDyr]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 05:08 PM by IKEA
Originally posted by grinny
By the way, is any of his footage from his and Jutta Rabe’s 2000 expedition available to the general public?

All the best.


You can find the Jutta Rabe documentary here:
Google Video

A couple of divers filmed and cut out a piece of a hole found in the hull which has clearly been caused by great force from the INSIDE of the ship. The hull was pushed OUT. The piece was later examined by demolition experts which confirmed that the hole COULD have been caused by an explosion.


[edit on 30-10-2007 by IKEA]



reply posted on 27-11-2007 @ 06:29 PM by Hellmutt
A new report says the official story was right the whole time. Nothing to see, move along.


Estonia report supports official investigation


27th November 2007


A new Swedish report will largely support the official account of the sinking in 1994 of the ferry Estonia, in which 852 people died, including 501 Swedes.

The report by a consortium including SSPA, a ship design consultancy, will conclude the disaster was caused by the loss of the ship's bow visor, and nothing else.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


I don't believe it


reply posted on 28-11-2007 @ 09:15 PM by Hellmutt
There seems to be a process going on, in order to bury the ferry Estonia conspiracies once and for all. More is now added to the mix, "supporting" the official bow visor story. Another Estonian ferry, the Fantaasia, is now being held back in Gothenburg, Sweden. It's not allowed to leave. The reason is that the ship is in very bad condition. They say it's not safe. It's sounds like they may have avoided "an accident just like Estonia". This is just too convenient...


M/S Fantaasia


Sweden’s inspectors bar Tallink liner from sailing due to numerous defects


Nov 28, 2007


An inspection of the ship found several technical shortcomings, including a missing backup bolt used to lock the bow visor, according to reports.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

A missing backup bolt for the bow visor on Fantaasia!? yeah, right. That indicates that there might have been a missing bolt on the Estonia as well, right? Nope, no way! I still don't believe that the bow visor caused the ferry Estonia to sink. And they also keep mixing the times for when the Estonia started to sink and when Estonia was gone. Now they say they might have been 15 minutes off. How is it possible to not know when Estonia started to sink? There was this NATO exercise and lots of activity. Did nobody notice what time it was? Nobody keep logs? Or are there any reliable logs from this area at all? They're trying to make the official story more believable.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 7 hours ago, 57 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 16 hours ago, 53 replies