Electrogravitics: the REAL Reason It Went Into Black Ops, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:31 PM by Amaterasu
reply to post by boncho



You know the drill. Despite My father's excitement DEFINING My early childhood... You're right.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:31 PM by playswithmachines
reply to post by Amaterasu



It's more than that, even.
According to Bearden, this technology could open all kinds of doors, like matter manipulation.
We could create any material in the atomic table we wanted, and the energy to do it would itself be part of the process.

This tech was officially killed in 1934:
"I think if one had to point to a single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation."(D. L. Hotson, "Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy," Part I, New Energy,Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.


edit on 20-1-2012 by playswithmachines because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:35 PM by playswithmachines
reply to post by boncho



Talking of 'negative energy'

How are ya, Bonch?

ETA; 2 more current links to read;
This and This.

Interesting how this topic gets more new threads as we move into the 'thirteenth level' or whatever the Mayans call it
edit on 20-1-2012 by playswithmachines because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:45 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by playswithmachines
reply to
post by Amaterasu



It's more than that, even.
According to Bearden, this technology could open all kinds of doors, like matter manipulation.
We could create any material in the atomic table we wanted, and the energy to do it would itself be part of the process.

This tech was officially killed in 1934:
"I think if one had to point to a single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation."(D. L. Hotson, "Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy," Part I, New Energy,Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.


Oh, I know. But adding too much to the picture will make People doubt all the more. And it is the energy that is the key to freedom.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:46 PM by zorgon
reply to post by playswithmachines


Maybe we need a machine that can tap that negative energy and use a converter to flip it


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:47 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by zorgon
reply to
post by playswithmachines


Maybe we need a machine that can tap that negative energy and use a converter to flip it


Oh, I wish there was a "ROFLMAO" button on posts! You would earn one from ME!

Thanks, zorg, for that brilliant response!


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 03:50 PM by playswithmachines
reply to post by zorgon



I have built a few, on similar principles.

You will have to go to my thread on the subject....

ETA; ....and watch the awful video's i posted
edit on 20-1-2012 by playswithmachines because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 15 days ago with 77 member flags
TV Networks Say You\'re Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
  Posted 3 days ago with 39 member flags
Schoolboy \'genius\' solves puzzles posed by Sir Isaac Newton
  Posted 3 days ago with 21 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 18 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 16 days ago with 19 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags