It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The sin offerings were not eaten by the people who had sinned but by a priest who would eat the sin, a designated sin eater.
The Jews had to eat the sacrifice and so do we.
Originally posted by 547000
What do you make of Daniel's mention of perpetual sacrifice?
So you guys thoroughly confussed enough and ready for me to shed light on the "Jew" issue with nothing more than scriputre? I have enjoyed the comments so far
Show me ONE.... just ONE verse in the bible which explicitly reads "Jews are Gods chosen people", and I promise I will leave this forum for good, and stand corrected all my life.
Yes, but the old covenant was abolished and it hasn't been fulfilled yet. It has to be talking about the new covenant.
So you're saying that a real, concrete hand, leg or eye is a mere allusion "to abstract spiritual concepts". Such as an abstract, spiritual hand, leg, or eye. Sounds like Plato to me, and that's Greek!
Jesus said the abomination of desolation, as spoken of in Daniel. Daniel was a popular apocalyptic book so Jesus could make an illusion to it and people would understand what he meant because Jesus would have understood how the people he was talking to understood it. Jesus did not go around at least in public where it is recorded, saying which books were or were not inspired. I doubt he was especially concerned about it and was kind of of the attitude of Why read the book when the person the books are about is with you right now. I think Jesus made it clear that all the prophecies were done with him and he was the new prophet and whatever was going to be prophesied about the future was being done by himself, with his interpretation. If there were writings about good things to come, then he was going to take those and make them better.
Originally posted by 547000
Yes, but the old covenant was abolished and it hasn't been fulfilled yet. It has to be talking about the new covenant.
Even Jesus paraphrased Daniel, so you can't claim that wasn't a divinely inspired book.
Mass happens every day too.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Jesus said the abomination of desolation, as spoken of in Daniel. Daniel was a popular apocalyptic book so Jesus could make an illusion to it and people would understand what he meant because Jesus would have understood how the people he was talking to understood it. Jesus did not go around at least in public where it is recorded, saying which books were or were not inspired. I doubt he was especially concerned about it and was kind of of the attitude of Why read the book when the person the books are about is with you right now. I think Jesus made it clear that all the prophecies were done with him and he was the new prophet and whatever was going to be prophesied about the future was being done by himself, with his interpretation. If there were writings about good things to come, then he was going to take those and make them better.
Originally posted by 547000
Yes, but the old covenant was abolished and it hasn't been fulfilled yet. It has to be talking about the new covenant.
Even Jesus paraphrased Daniel, so you can't claim that wasn't a divinely inspired book.
Mass happens every day too.edit on 10-12-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Hey, hang on.. where in the bible does it say the old covenant was "abolished".
You might want to be a little specific about what it is you are objecting to.
He never said any such thing. You're just reading all this stuff into it. THis is not even a view passed down from the apostles.
Luke 16:16
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by jmdewey60
Full verse please?
Daniel was not a law but a prophecy, shut up till the end of time.