It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

# Numerical Analysis of Genesis 5

page: 1
3
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 09:42 PM
www.bartleby.com...

I'm sure many people are familiar with Genesis 5. By using the numbers of when each person "begat" their children, and dividing that number into the number of years until they died, as well as the total amount of years that they lived, shows an interesting relationship with these numbers.

For example: Adam lived 130 years, then begat Seth, he lived for 800 years after, and died at 930.

years old when Seth was begat 130
years after Seth was begat 800/130=6.15384615384
total years until death 930/130=7.15384615384

Here is the breakdown:

130
800/130=6.15384615384
930/130=7.15384615384

Seth
105
807/105=7.68571428571
912/105=8.68571428571

Enos
90
815/90=9.055555555555
905/90=10.05555555555

Cainan
70
840/70=12
910/70=13

Mahalaleel
65
830/65=12.7692307692
895/65=13.7692307692

Jared
162
800/162=4.93827160493
962/162=5.93827160493

Enoch
65
300/65=4.61538461538
365/65=5.61538461538

Methuselah
187
782/187=4.18181818181
969/187=5.18181818181

Lamech
182
595/182=3.26923076923
777/182=4.26923076923

Noah
500
450/500=0.9
950/500=1.9

A few things to notice:

There is an obvious system of numbers at work here. Is this intentional thru grand design or have the numbers been changed to fit the system?

The numbers shown in Cainan are the only whole numbers. Does anyone know more information about Cainan that may show an importance to the numbers 12 and 13. Also note that the progression of numbers increases until Cainan (the only whole number), increases once more, and then progessively decreases after.

I would like some opinions on what these numbers could signify...if anything.

edit on 5-12-2011 by isyeye because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-12-2011 by isyeye because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 09:46 PM
Holy smokes I think you've found something.

Wait. Who is "Cainan"?

David Grouchy

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 09:57 PM
IMO,
It's just a coincidence.
Cainan isn't mentioned much in the bible.
However, he is talked about in the Book of Jubilees.
Hmmm, come to think of it. He was described as having great knowledge of astrology.
12 Zodiac signs...
Maybe you have stumbled upon something. I'll have to look into it.

edit on 5-12-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-12-2011 by GmoS719 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:01 PM

"According to the Book of Jubilees, Cainan was taught to read by his father, and he found, carved on the rocks by former generations, an inscription preserving the science of astrology as taught by the Watchers, who had rebelled from God before the deluge. He is also stated to have married a daughter of Madai named Milcah."

According to biblical texts he was the first astronomer/astrologer who was taught by the watchers...

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:10 PM

You can do that with all numbers.

If you take the age at which someone has a kid..

Take their remainder years until they die
And take their number of years lived total

And do all that math.. it's always going to have that mathematical and numerical relationship.

For instance...

Someone has a kid when they're 20

They die at 85

so thats 65 years till they died after they had the kid..

whats 85-65? = 20.. of course

You'll always have the remainder value except with a factor of 1 difference..

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:15 PM
I take it back...
Do this math on the entire Genealogy of Adam and Eve and see if you find something.
You can't just pick and choose.

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:16 PM

I agree with what you are saying. Do you have any opinions on the increase of numbers until 12 and 13, and then the decrease?....or is it just coincidence?

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:20 PM

I don't understand what you're asking. Like numbers from 1-13?

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:25 PM

The ending numbers after being divided for each person progressively get larger until Cainan, and then decrease.

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:32 PM

Fair enough there is something strange about those numbers but what do they mean? nothing still, like most other theories that have been brought out and tweaked to suit the authors theory.

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:35 PM

If you look at your math it, Cainan isn't the zenith. It increases a little more then it decreases.

Honestly, it just looks like coincidence to me.

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 10:45 PM

I'm not implying that Cainan was the zenith, just that it's an odd sequence of numbers. I would think that the odds would be rather high that a series of numbers figured this way would progressively increase to a whole number, increase once more, and then progressively decrease.
edit on 5-12-2011 by isyeye because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 11:16 PM

Even Better. Divide the two ages and then reverse of the other numbers.

130
800/130=6.15384615384
930/130=7.15384615384
930/800=1.1625
130/800=0.1625

Seth
105
807/105=7.68571428571
912/105=8.68571428571
912/807=1.130111
105/807-0.130111

Enos
90
815/90=9.055555555555
905/90=10.05555555555
905/815=1.1104
90/815=0.1104

Cainan
70
840/70=12
910/70=13
910/840=1.0833333333333
70/840=0.1833333333333

Mahalaleel
65
830/65=12.7692307692
895/65=13.7692307692
895/830=1.07831
65/830=0.07831

Jared
162
800/162=4.93827160493
962/162=5.93827160493
962/800=1.2025
162/800=0.2025

Enoch
65
300/65=4.61538461538
365/65=5.61538461538
365/300=1.2166666666666
65/300=0.21666666666666

Methuselah
187
782/187=4.18181818181
969/187=5.18181818181
969/782=1.23913
187/782=0.23913

Lamech
182
595/182=3.26923076923
777/182=4.26923076923
777/595=1.30588
182/595=1.30588

Noah
500
450/500=0.9
950/500=1.9
950/450=2.11111111111111
500/450=1.11111111111111

Astonishing.

No, I'll make one up.

George
245
600/245=2.4489
820/245=3.3469
820/600=1.36666666
245/820=0.2987

God wins. Now what does it mean?

edit on 5-12-2011 by SuperiorEd because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-12-2011 by SuperiorEd because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 11:17 PM

two things spring to mind,

one is non liner wave form overlapps, frequency wave form coherence

or

the egyptions of ancient history used fractions with other fractions either added or subtracted to explain very important numbers like phi

maby these are important frequency overlapp points form the use of sound

just guesses tho

xploder

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 11:28 PM
For Cainan

the 12/13 ratio is an angle of a 5/12/13 right triangle, where the numbers are the lengths of the sides.
edit on 5-12-2011 by tovenar because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 11:36 PM

I have a friend in the math department at a university. He's a super genius. He'll get back to me in a few days or so. I'll get back to it and let you know. It's probably the grand unified field theory or something simple like that.

posted on Dec, 5 2011 @ 11:46 PM

Seth 105 800+7 905+7
Enosh 90 815 905
Kenan 70 840 910
Mahalalel 65 830 895
Jared 155+7 800 955+7
Enoch 65 300 365
Methuselah 180+7 775+7 955+7+7
Lamech 175+7 595 770+7=777

Seth +7 912 Foundation.

Enosh ---- 905 Human being.
Kenan ---- 910 Owner, possession, gain. Variant of Cain.
Mahalalel ---- 895 Praise of God, God lets his light shine.

Jared +7 962 Going down, descent.
Enoch 365 365 Teacher. Beginning.

Methuselah +7+7 969 Man of spear (or sword or weapon).
Lamech +7=777 777 Strong. He who overcomes.

posted on Dec, 6 2011 @ 12:13 AM
In the interest of seeing if there is some sort of pattern, I did the numbers for Genesis 11 as well.

Shem
100
500/100=5
600/100=6

35
403/35=11.5142857143
438/35=12.5142857143

Salah
30
403/30=13.43333333333
433/30=14.43333333333

Eber
34
430/34=12.6470588235
464/34=13.6470588235

Peleg
30
209/30=7.9666666666
239/30=8.9666666666

Reu
32
207/32=6.46875
239/32=7.46875

Serug
30
200/30=6.6666666666
230/30=7.6666666666

Nahor
29
119/29=4.10344827586
148/29=5.10344827586

Terah
70
135/70=1.92857142857
205/70=2.92857142857

It doesn't seem to follow a consistant pattern, but there are more "ups and downs".

posted on Dec, 6 2011 @ 06:32 AM

Thanks for that information. I was looking at the ratio of the numbers, but didn't see any link to triangles.

posted on Dec, 6 2011 @ 12:09 PM

new topics

top topics

3