Identity of Terracotta Warriors sparks new debate: (No aliens, no oddities..you'll see), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 05:21 PM by crankyoldman
First I must say a most refreshing approach to a topic. This seems to be because no one has any preprogrammed absolute on the purpose of these and, as such, the discussion is full of great ideas.

I wonder why archeologists always seem to think an obsession with death is the reason for everything. Case in point, the Pyramids and the "death" chamber. It seems fairly clear that Tut - and irish bloke, moved in long after they were built and had no clue what they were really for, the death chamber thing is wrong but because those who saw it first can't think of any other reason, they assume that is it and then everyone one who comes along after has to PROVE that meme, a guessed meme, wrong.

I am amazed at those who contend that prior to 1500, everyone who looked to the sky was simply obsessed with movement, movement of things that had zero effect on their lives - planets, stars, star systems. In fact, in a great many cases the "obsession" was not about just knowing mercury goes this way and not that, but because leaving the planet was a daily occurrence until it was forbidden about 2000 years ago after the earth was quarantined. Knowing where planets were going to be was necessary for navigation.

I can say this from personal experience. I have done something that only I know what the true purpose is for. Now, or even 100 years into the future, not one single person will get it right - not one. So the idea that these folks are know it alls is funny.

As for our clay people. Back in the day an army was as much for show as for fighting. The pomp and display was theatrical stare down of who's army is bigger - some battles were one before they started by this effort. If we assume that the army he had would be better served to be bigger, it is possible the were made to create a larger army - in appearance, to the enemy. If the enemy was met out in the field, far enough away, the soldiers would look real. They were kept underground to give spies nothing to look at while not in use. In the absence of blow up plastic or Styrofoam, it would seem clay was it. It is also possible they were made by each soldier to look like himself, as a kind of way to pass the time, or even to add discipline - sailors mop the deck endlessly to have something to do.


reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 11:29 PM by anon72
reply to post by MrsBlonde



You bring up some very good points.

Crazy as a bat


reply posted on 7-12-2011 @ 07:40 AM by anon72
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow



That actually makes the most sense. To me.

Nice one. STAR (i gave to you last night but I couldn't respond until now).

I wonder why.... when a theory is debunked well enough... that the other side stays away......?

Meaning.... if the thread would lend some credit to the other theories... this they may have done better...



edit on 12/7/2011 by anon72 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Amazing, X-Ray probe of Antikythera Mechanism (Video)
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Eye of Horus is actually an early math system?
  Posted 16 days ago with 45 member flags
Pi, Golden Ratio and Speed of Light encoded into Great Pyramid
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Why is the Ancient Alien Theory difficult to accept?
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
Unknown ancient language found on unearthed Assyrian tablets
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
"The Venus Blueprint"
  Posted 13 days ago with 16 member flags
The Lost City of Vilcabamba
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
The Istanbul Shem rocket-ship
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags