It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
There are far too many witnesses, anecdotes,
Originally posted by jimnuggits
artifacts, physical evidences, proofs
Originally posted by jimnuggits
stories, historical texts, ancient architectural anomalies
Originally posted by jimnuggits
photographs, videos,
Originally posted by jimnuggits
pilot and military witnesses,
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by AwakeinNM
That's exactly what a skeptic would say. Let me remind you that eyewitness testimony is admissible in court as evidence. I have seen one, my family members have seen them. That is proof enough for us.
But I'm not you though am I?
Eyewitness testimony may well be admissible in court, but whilst someone may testify in court that they saw "something" and that the same court may well agree that they saw "something"......it doesn't prove that they saw aliens....... to my knowledge "proof of aliens" hasn't had a trial date fixed yet.
Thank for pointing out this protcol by ATS. I was not aware of it
Originally posted by jimnuggits
I know it is against ATS protocol to shine light in the corners,
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by Algernonsmouse
Tone is not something that the written word can convey, although I understand your meaning.
I am being intentionally adverserial in an effort to show the frustration I feel when skeptics demand proof and look for none.
There is proof running out our collective ears, yet still the demand is made.
Forgive me, but the numbers of stories, physical implants, eye witness testimony and mysterious artifacts are proof in and of themselves.
For every piece of possible tangible real "proof" there are, who knows how many, intentional fakes, forgeries, misidentified and dare I say "hoaxed" artifacts, photos and testimonies.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by Algernonsmouse
There is proof running out our collective ears, yet still the demand is made.
Forgive me, but the numbers of stories, physical implants, eye witness testimony and mysterious artifacts are proof in and of themselves.
Maybe they are scared of your scary Avatar face! Just Kiddin' I could'nt resist
Originally posted by Druid42
How about this? In the over sixty years since Roswell, there is no clear evidence, no actual spaceships, and no press conferences indicating the presence of alien life.
If they are out there, wouldn't we have solid, undeniable proof by now? Sixty years, and no firsthand contact?
What gives?
Originally posted by Algernonsmouse
... Proving to me that this stuff is real would not "ruin my day." Quite the opposite, it would be an amazing thing to find out. Being skeptical means wanting proof over blind faith, it is not about being opposed to you.
reply to post by SuperKawaiiNibiru
Eyewitness accounts may work in a court of law, but when it comes to science, they're the lowest form of evidence.
Originally posted by lifeform11
do you know what a lower form of evidence is than that? listening to people who have seen nothing or witnessed nothing.
Originally posted by lifeform11
i mean if a u.f.o. incident occured who would you listen to first?